this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

politics

19058 readers
565 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Oliver Anthony became a viral sensation with Rich Men North of Richmond. We sent ‪@heyjohnrussell‬ to an Oliver Anthony concert in Michigan to find out why the song still resonates. The answer tells a bigger story about what people want in this election—and for this country.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I thought I was gonna hate that video but I didn't. Its just good to hear a lot of people know the top of our society is ratfucking the bottom. Its good to hear the singer refute his bullshit line about fudge candies and obese people. And god damn I wanna hug that guy with the one ear ring because he's right, just a normal dude somewhere, but he's right. You see, this shit is real easy to see when propaganda isn't pissed in our eyes constantly, but for a lot it is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

MPU makes good stuff.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah it really feels like they almost have a sense of class consciousness and when you tear away the "politics" from the politics, they know who's fucking them over.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I feel like a ton of conservatives would actually be socialists if they had any idea what socialism actually was. Mostly they have only known the word as a synonym for 'thing I don't like,' but I always find it striking how much socialist language conservatives use when they want to get their base on board with something. Even the introduction for project 2025 goes like: socialist idea, socialist idea, socialist idea, statement condemning socialism as the cause of the world's problems, positive sounding authoritarian statement presented as a solution. Then it goes back to socialist statements to keep the reader engaged and feeling like the author is working in their best interest. It's like some weird rope-a-dope bait and switch strategy.

I bet if socialism got a rebranding that stripped out all the language that usually triggers the conservatives, you'd see a lot of conservatives jump on board with it. At least until the billionaires spin up their media machines to destroy it again.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

What it often is, is they want an easy solution. The idea that things are bad isn't lost on them, but when presented a choice between someone laying out a multistep plan and someone presenting a convenient scapegoat, they're happy to run with the scapegoat every time.

It's not even entirely an inherently conservative thing. Many of us can fall prey to it due to the fatigue of late stage capitalism and just running with something we want to believe without researching the underpinnings.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you look at national polls at the macro level, Americans agree more often than not.

It's these "culture wars" that divide us, because if we realized that we control the means of production and there was a general strike of even just 30% of the population this economy would grind to a halt. However Fox News, Breitbart and the rest need us to argue about mustard suits or gas stoves to distract us.

https://theconversation.com/surprise-american-voters-actually-largely-agree-on-many-issues-including-topics-like-abortion-immigration-and-wealth-inequality-229458

https://oxfordre.com/americanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-330

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

It's pretty much why there was a really "odd" Bernie/Trump voter. They're sick of the "establishment" fucking them over and were on board with what Bernie had to say, and unfortunately fell for the lies of Trump too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

“He’s the world’s best crime boss.”

And from a podcast about NAFTA and Masterlock I heard the other day “trump is gangster.”

These are the people who want Trump in charge to disrupt the system and it’s fucking terrifying.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

The thoughts on welfare. Fuck me. These people have never actually known anyone on welfare, acting like it's a lifetime job. I was making $83K and lost my job, no fault. I'll be getting $275 a week unemployment for a max of $3,500. That's not what I was making a month, after $1,400 in child support. And I won't get food stamps because my wife makes $17 an hour. We're too wealthy.

“There's a storm coming, Mr. Wayne. You and your friends better batten down the hatches, because when it hits, you're all gonna wonder how you ever thought you could live so large and leave so little for the rest of us.”

Any wonder the handful of billionaires who own our media constantly rail against the best multipurpose weapon a working man can use and afford? Ever thought on that? Huh.