this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
5 points (85.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43606 readers
1148 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just curious because I don’t see people talk about it a lot.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I assume this depends on where you live, though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

The transition from analog to digital really hurt my desire to watch OTA TV (you caught me! I'm not under 25).

With analog broadcast, any weak signal or interference produced a little bit of static, but you could still see and hear what was being said. With digital, any weak signal means dropped frames and silence or weird glitches. You completely lose what's happening. Even with a powered antenna, I have frequent issues with weak signal. I could probably try to get a rooftop antenna installed, but there's no guarantee it would be any better. It's just easier to find other entertainment at this point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

17 here, my grandparents used it before switching 1-2 years ago. Can't imagine the ads are any better that less people watch it and staticy stations were annoying.

I myself don't watch TV that much, mainly YouTube or music. In the last month I've watched ~3 episodes of impractical jokers on the family TV, and 8 episodes of South Park on my Steamdeck before bed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Bro is 17 in this economy πŸ’€

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

r/piracy megathread all the way

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

I don't care about cable TV. In Hungary nearly all news broadcasts over here are just propaganda machines and spitting out literal garbage content. Also the ads.

UbO + Internet + torrent goes br

23 year old here btw

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Im really glad I moved to germany, aside from all my bad experiences there, the whole place was a shithole from the beginning. I just want to See that place burn

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

See this is what I’m talking about. Cable is not the same as over the air. I’m not sure how your cable works in Hungary content/pricing-wise, but I do find it funny that a lot of younger people in this thread are lumping the two together.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Cable isn't the same as OTA but from a viewer standpoint they're both live TV. Live TV in the US is basically unwatchable unless you really like sports or 24/7 news commentary (even then live news is usually also available through phone apps) and don't mind being interrupted by ads every 2 minutes.

Anything else is better watched with torrents/piracy streaming sites. They don't stop the show to serve some random combination of medicine, home insurance, and car ads.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

What about sports tho?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

(Assuming you mean DVB-T). In some place OTA is just the standard. Where I'm from cable TV is simply unheard of and all terrestrial digital channels are free with varying degree of ads.

Another great example of how things work so different in different parts of the world

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So you only pay for the extraterrestrial channels?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You pay a small tax for public channels (that should have no ads) and you pay for satellite tv

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

So it doesn't matter if they are human or alien?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I am aware. I am also aware that I haven't used cable tv over a decade and I do not regret ditching that garbage

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah but instead of $60/mo, it’s free.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Free garbage is still garbage

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So to answer the original question, have you tried it and are you under 25?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

As someone who meets your criteria, why would I ever put an antenna on my shit again when I can just pirate things or block the ads? An added benefit is that companies think both hurt them as if they are people and subverting their BS fills me with joy.

Whether the commenters are talking cable or not, both are arguably garbage alternatives to more contemporary methods of streaming media except in special circumstances due to the abundance of cell tower coverage and bandwidth. I wish I could say that radio was not also lumped in with this, but again, 50% of airtime is ads and I find the radio in my car less useful with each passing year.

You're allowed to like something and have people younger than you disagree. Fighting and talking down to them isn't going to change their minds. It's cool that you still get use out of older technology for free, but not everyone gets the same value from it.

If anything, don't blame young people for ruining your technology, blame capitalism for enshittifying it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

Linear TV over an antenna? Well that's only technically free. You'd need to buy a receiving device - that costs money. You need to watch ads - that costs time.