this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
162 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

58691 readers
3805 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Clearly, Google is serious about trying to oust ad blockers from its browser, or at least those extensions with fuller (V2) levels of functionality. One of the crucial twists with V3 is that it prevents the use of remotely hosted code – as a security measure – but this also means ad blockers can’t update their filter lists without going through Google’s review process. What does that mean? Way slower updates for said filters, which hampers the ability of the ad-blocking extension to keep up with the necessary changes to stay effective.

(This isn’t just about browsers, either, as the war on advert dodgers extends to YouTube, too, as we’ve seen in recent months).

At any rate, Google is playing with fire here somewhat – or Firefox, perhaps we should say – as this may be the shove some folks need to get them considering another of the best web browsers out there aside from Chrome. Mozilla, the maker of Firefox, has vowed to maintain support for V2 extensions, while introducing support for V3 alongside to give folks a choice (now there’s a radical idea).

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 week ago (39 children)

I downloaded Librewolf today - the privacy oriented fork of Firefox!

Good to see there are browser variants that aren't just Chrome.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yep firefox with arkenfox for me, same deal as librewolf. And Mull on mobile.

Switched about 2-3 months ago thinking it might be difficult or impact me negatively or something but its been easy and great.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You know the problem I have with Librewolf? -- Fuckall nobody knows how to spell it.

The beauty of Firefox is that even the densest idiot knows how to spell those two words. And with attention spans the equivalent of a gnat, people need to have things simplified for them as much as humanly possible.

Fortunately enough, Firefox is about the only one with a renderer that isn't controlled by Google, but - even now they're shifting to a pro-advertising stance and backing off of the privacy orientation that they took just a year or two ago.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (10 children)

We’re going to have a serious problem on our hands soon with compatibility. I’m a software dev and I’m already seeing a few issues here and there where Chrome is being treated as the default expected browser and features don’t work on Firefox.

Firefox doesn’t support a fair few Chrome features because of security and privacy reasons, such as WebHID, WebUSB, etc.

Devs, please stop using those features. I know it’s tempting, but they’re basically bribes to encourage you to sell out to Google. Don’t do it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

We’re going to have a serious problem on our hands soon with compatibility. I’m a software dev and I’m already seeing a few issues here and there where Chrome is being treated as the default expected browser and features don’t work on Firefox.

It's basically IE6 and ActiveX all over again.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Most "Chrome-only" web applications I have to use I can get around just by changing my user agent string and everything works fine. I try not to use that stuff when I can, though.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

This is my experience. They are just taking your default agent and throwing up a message because they can’t be assed to do minimal testing in FF.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Firefox doesn’t support a fair few Chrome features because of security and privacy reasons, such as WebHID, WebUSB

I'm very serious about my opinion that we are better off without them. If the feature does not exist, it cannot be activated by a bug in the permission system, and also the lesser technically inclined people won't allow them by reflex/accident

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just don't use services that don't work with Firefox. Easy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm using Firefox as my only browser. If everything works in Firefox that's fine for me.

That's the best advantage of only making websites / web applications for fun (for friend groups, video games, family etc)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There's no need to wait. Just switch to Firefox now. All the cool kids have already done it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The cool kids are switching to Librewolf because whatever is happening at Mozilla is increasingly concerning by the day.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some of us switched to Chrome when it was legitimately better, but are back now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)

The lack of HVEC/h.265 support is kind of a deal breaker in firefox (windows nightly builds don't count as done). I need it to view h.265 security cameras and the occasional movie streamed via browser.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's good that I use Firefox and will continue to be ad free then, eh?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I sure hope so. I've been on team Mozilla for a long time, but right at this critical moment they are starting to wobble. Their CEO seems to be steering them in a direction that I don't agree with.

(I still believe Firefox is the best option right now; but I'm a little concerned for the future.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And we started with "Don't be evil"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I believe their new slogan is "Fuck em', what they gonna do!?".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I remember the internet before Google, and how game changing it was to have all of the internet indexed in one place (even if that wasn’t actually quite true back then). If you had asked me 15, 10, even 5 years ago if I would be cheering its downfall and yearning for a return to a simpler, far less centralized internet, I would have called you crazy. And yet here we are.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It wasn't hard to foresee. We knew these kind of things could happen. The internet used to be very out spoken about it. That ethos is long gone. What's equally disappointing is tech nerds selling out for bigger paychecks.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

While this will drive some users to Firefox, we all know it won't be enough. Too many people simple don't know, or don't care, it won't affect their lives in any meaningful way, or so they will believe. Google will be harming the tech illiterate and normies (sorry for the slur) because money, bullshit, and to drive the stake deeper into the monopoly. If you have older family members using chrome, sit them down and explain to them the dangers of the internet without adblock.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (12 children)

It gets me thinking. Tech literate people are the types to install blockers, and would be the same type of people both motivated and knowledgeable about how to switch browsers. On the line of thinking it seems like it is just going to drive them away from Chrome. Tech illiterate people remain unaffected since they are getting ads anyway.

But then on the other hand, if someone is tech literate then why are they even still using Chrome? Does such a person value whatever advantage Chrome theoretically provides over their ad-blocking?

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Man fuck google

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Good thing I'm on LibreWolf that comes with uBlock Origin.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wasn't there just an article about how Mozilla is claiming ublock origin shouldn't be supported anymore and another one claiming they're starting a focus on ads?

I feel like we're entering a really shitty time for the Internet... Tie that in with Microsucks Recall feature and computing in general is going to suck...

I don't want to go touch grass!!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The closest I can find is

https://www.ghacks.net/2024/10/01/mozillas-massive-lapse-in-judgement-causes-clash-with-ublock-origin-developer/

Which is only the "lite" version (which really has no reason to be used in firefox) and was likely based on an improper scan. Which happens constantly and is usually an email and a few days of waiting rather than immediately going to the press.

If you can find something about Mozilla actually being anti-adblock or disabling manifest v2 that would be incredibly useful. But maybe be aware of what is going on before vaguely making major claims?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

IIRC Mozilla doubled down on their v2 support when Chrome announced the shift to v3. But then the Chrome monopoly judgment came down and with it a lot of speculation on Google dropping their funding of Mozilla, so maybe Mozilla could be changing its tune to either protect or find a replacement for that funding? Nothing of substance is happening yet, it's still all speculation, but I do hope nothing like that does happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In fact, uBlock Origin is one of the officially recommended extensions by Mozilla

uBO Lite was incorrectly flagged as violating policy by someone at Mozilla, but rather than appeal that decision in any capacity at all, the developer just removed the add-on entirely without responding to Mozilla. The original decision was almost certainly just an error.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When is this happening? I've been telling my wife and kid that they need to stop using chrome for a year, but ublock is still working for them and blocking YouTube ads. They are the type that won't switch until it becomes a problem for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I don't understand seemingly intelligent people who still blindly use chrome at this point...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

For those of us who work in (or love) tech - we (myself included) grossly overestimate how much the general public cares about, or cares to be informed about, this stuff. Heck, even people in tech who know better.

I wish it wasn’t the case but look how long and hard Microsoft moved on Internet Explorer and ActiveX back in the early days of the web.

Google and Chrome is just another bit of history repeating.

As an aside, I’ve been using Zen for about a week and it’s been wonderful. Easy transition from Firefox because it largely is Firefox, so all my containers, extensions, and settings carried over. Zen’s workspaces provide exactly the promise I’d hoped “tab groups” brought with Safari (but never worked right). I just wish there was an equivalent to the Hush plug-in on Safari (even after a year of full-timing FF, consent-o-matic is quite poor).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's not about intelligence it's about what keeps you up at night. Most people aren't bothered by cookies and ads, somehow.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

this is something i cannot understand. my brain would fking die from the seizures the modern, ad infested web induces.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And the creepiness. Advertisers can deduce many habits based on the information you give them. Some techniques can tell when people are pregnant before they do based on their pathing inside the store, for instance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

And yet, all they continue to sell me is a dryer when I just bought one a month ago.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I kinda have to at work. Our classroom computers reset between classes and Chrome is the only browser installed. I might ask IT about that, moving forward, given uBlock getting neutered soon.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

when you ask them, don't only mention ublock, but the privacy aspects of only allowing the browser of the largest data collection fueled ad company

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Honestly, our IT peeps aren't idiots. They'd probably agree with me. It's admin who make the overall decisions. I might be able to swing "also Firefox" to be included when they inevitably update the repo.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›