Reinforcement learning research has been using Atari games as standard benchmarks for over a decade now and no one has faced legal issues yet.
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
23 points (92.6% liked)
Asklemmy
43894 readers
928 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(not a lawyer). If you bought the game copies that the AIs are playing, then it seems like you're not making a copy of the game just to have the AI play it.
That kind of assumes that your AI is playing the game through a mechanism like AutoHotKey, generating keyboard or controller inputs that pass through the operating system to the game.
If your AI hooks into or modifies the game code to "play", then it could run afoul of anti-reverse engineering clauses that are common in the click through license agreements. Those clauses may not be enforceable in your jurisdiction. Legal results on anti-reverse engineering clauses are kind of mixed in the United States.
Edit: for reference, there was a software called "Glider" that played World of Warcraft for you, so you don't have to grind to level up. Blizzard absolutely hated the makers of Glider, but it stuck around for a long time, before it was ultimately sued into oblivion.
(definitely not a lawyer) If you play multiplayer games (especially ranked stuff) you might be going against some "no botting" rule of that games tos.
One clear and dry example of this that comes to mind is that Code Bullet got banned from JStris(or some other online tetris server?) because he was botting and not in their dedicated bot queue
it's jstris, and i really want to watch his bot get absolutely destroyed by one of the top players like firestorm or czsmall
or another bot! tetris has had a pretty big following for the development of bots, and it's basically min-maxed at this point. i want to watch CB's bot get destroyed by cold clear running at 1.5pps.
Only if you're big enough to pay your way out of it
Not a lawyer
Should be fair use under most circumstances.
However, with online multiplayer, you'd be at the mercy of whoever's running the server, and usually they'd hate bots in any way and form.
Trackmania players have been doing it for many years. I do not think if it is illegal.