They'll get a slap on the wrist fine that nowhere near accounts for the amount of money they made doing this.
this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
569 points (99.3% liked)
Technology
58303 readers
11 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
True but this also sets precedent for other cases which is an overall win. But i do wish the fines were bigger I agree with you there.
They need to do a percentage of revue, rather than a fixed price for businesses. Affects bigger companies harder, but let's smaller ones still work through it.
Fine of at least 150% of money earned, though they'll just say it earned them nothing
It sets the size of the fee the company will need to pay to do it.
I loved how EU set fines for GDPR breaches and I feel the same should be applied in other fields when companies are involved. There are two tiers of penalties, with a maximum of 20m euros or 4% of global revenue. That way they feel it. Really feel it. Google got smacked 50 million € for GDPR breach. H&M 35M.
HP has one of the worst customer experiences out there. I don't understand why people keep buying HP trash.
People use it because hp printers are cheap, but the users dont know what they are putting themselves into by buying hp.
software locks are inherently immoral and anti consumer.
All of them, or just specific instances?
Stallman from FSF would probably say only if the software is updateable. Firmware which can't be changed is no different from hardware. I kind of agree, even though he said that about open source. But the point still stands. If printer can't be used without account or always online or ink. Then it's a feature. Whether you agree with it or not, vote with your wallet. However if they hide the feature that's misleading advertising and it's a different crime all together.
But what HP tried to do is to send over the air update that prevented printers from using recycled toner. Now that's a bitch move.
EAT IT YOU LITTLE SHITS
Sadly, they earned a lot of money and this was just calculated expense of doing business. Pretty much all big companies operate like that. Abuse the system, rake in money, leave some aside for settling lawsuits. Forbidding them to sell products for a specific time or recalling all the printers and giving money back... that would make them think twice about next time.
I love how so many comments and replies ascribe some form of ‘guilt’ to this, as if HP employees would feel shame. This doesn’t really mean anything to a company that size.
One of the great things about moving to the UK is that, despite all its problems, consumer protection Europe is so much better than in the US.
Good!
Next they need to be charged for the ink itself... Literally the most expensive liquid on the planet, more than fucking LSD!
And a hearty fuck you to HP Sales execs, may their children fritter their unearned stock grants on glow in the dark drink umbrellas.