this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
66 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7106 readers
463 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Ontario government is considering bringing forward legislation that could prohibit the installation of bike lanes when lanes for motor vehicles are removed as a result, sources say.

Siemiatycki said "this government has signalled that the car is king," pointing to prior steps the governing Progressive Conservatives (PCs) have taken to ease costs for drivers.

He sees the PCs as making a clear play for the votes of motorists, and believes the policy would also appeal to many drivers frustrated with congestion on the roads.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

This is such a municipal issue it's annoying to see the Province wanting to butt in in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Municipal government is an extension of provincial government. City councils have no real power, in effect they merely advise. Their authority comes from the provincial government, who can overrule any decision they make, and even substitute their own.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago

This is not well understood. I don't know if it is different by province but it's definitely the case in Ontario. The Ontario provincial government can do anything with cities, including dissolve and create them.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

This is what bugs me about the Ford government

They want none of the responsibilities or finances of a provincial government, and they constantly want to step in to municipal issues and politics.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

Remember how he fucked with TOs city hall?

When they show you who they are, believe them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago

What do you expect from a conservative government? This cuts into oil consumption and green alternatives. Can't have that!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 14 hours ago

This is just another example of Ford's retail politics.

From the guy who brought you "buck a beer" and handing out twenties when he was running for CPC leader.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago

Is that a typo? You mean barring car lanes where bike lanes need to go, right?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

I think we need to keep educating the people we know that the only way to decrease traffic in the city is to move as many people as possible out of their cars into public transit or on bikes. That's an easy point to make.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I keep trying, and around the younger people my age it's mostly agreement, but when it comes to people even just slightly older they just "like driving" and hate cyclists and think public transit sucks. They don't understand that the reason for their dislike is due to the poor biking and transit infrastructure and car-centric roads and cities.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Totally fine. When I get that, I go with "Well a lot of people don't like driving; transit and bikes take those cars away from the road so your driving will be nicer. The more people in cars the worse the driving for you. We can't build wide enough to accommodate it while being able to afford living here. Transit and bikes are much cheaper and get cars out of your way. Vroom vroom"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

Preface: I work with a hard core "they're going to make us eat crickets" kinda guy.

He was going on about how "how bad traffic is in the GTA and how they are trying to take away our cars so that no one drives any more." So I point out that if they added a bunch more Go Trains in the GTA you wouldn't need your car to commute AND there would be less traffic on the highway for the people who do drive.

But where are you going to park all those extra trains.

Bruh. There are how many million fucking cars that drive to the GTA and park every god damned day but you want to know where they are going to park 30 trains?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago

Tell him they fold flat for storage.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 17 hours ago

But where are you going to park all those extra trains.

Bad faith argument and false equivalency.

They don't think a second about the spatial constraints of cars, so using this argument is a failed attempt at using the enemy's weapons against themselves.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 20 hours ago

Car brain disease..

Show them a picture of the Mimico railyard. Then blow their mind with "with 24-hour service, fewer trains need parking."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago

They don’t, they keep rolling all day, unlike cars that sit still most of their life.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Lol, yeah, rail depots are just such a mystery to figure out. I guess the fact that you can put these anywhere out of the way means the guy has never seen one. As opposed to parking garages that have to be at the destination.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

I know google's amp links are BS designed to keep in you a google ecosystem and never take you to the actual content creators' sites. Do you mind outlining for my and others' edification what's not to like about CBC's links with "amp" in them? I'd love to know. Thanks!