this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
535 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

58133 readers
4050 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 hour ago

The concern isn’t that these companies have microtargeting data. The concern is about what these companies could use that data for.

An off-brand t-shirt site would be a fairly ineffective vehicle for political propaganda. Tik Tok would be great at that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

TikTok literally got people to commit check fraud

[–] [email protected] 3 points 31 minutes ago (1 children)

TilTok likely got my car stolen (Hyundai vulnerability trended on TikTok)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 minutes ago

yes i know a kia owner with a similar story

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

I bet you they can actually

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, better ban them all, don't see why not

[–] [email protected] 31 points 19 hours ago

US tech companies too, you fucking cowards.

Facebook paid kids to install a VPN client on their smartphones so they could intercept AND DECRYPT traffic between competing services (like Snapchat, Amazon, Youtube)

facebook and any other company they acquire (or however they try to rebrand) are not only untrustworthy but active adversaries against common decency and basic privacy

[–] [email protected] 30 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

America selectively caring about privacy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

The concern isn’t the input, it’s the potential output. Temu doesn’t have the potential to be used for a large micro-targeted political messaging campaign.

This is arguably more akin to how the US handles TV and radio. There are national security restrictions on foreign ownership.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago

They care about companies they have less control over and a foreign adversary has more control over invading privacy, for reasons unrelated to seeing privacy as a good in itself.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Is tiktok saying that all Chinese apps that steal our data are also stealing our data because they were designed to steal our data?!

I am SHOCKED.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 21 hours ago

You don't even need the word Chinese

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It's time to start taxing the acquisition, retention, and selling/trading of personal data.

Actually, that time was 40 years ago.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Better solution.

Data are owned by the generator. Only they can sell it etc...

This also solves the privacy problem of law enforcement agencies applying warrants to phone companies etc. for access to your data, which has been an end-run around 4th Amendment rights for decades.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 21 hours ago

GDPR is a start, but we need to actually ban it, not just annoy people until they click Accept at the 20th popup of that tantalising offer to share your details with 1473 trusted data partners.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Google and Microsoft would be scrambling to pay off every single person associated with that before it ever hit the first courtroom floor.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

ohhh data collection taxation, I like it. You would think it would be a no-brainer but look at marijuana taxation and the continued resistance to rake in all that public funding. Would make most of the controversy around AI disappear if they tax it's collection.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Good point, we'll ban all of them"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

"Thanks for bringing it to our attention. You are now banned as well"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

What about Lenovo, Aliexpress, Xiaomi, Didi (It's famous in latam), BYD, NIO?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 40 minutes ago

I think it should depend on the software and what's being collected & shared, also where it's hosted.

While Lenovo has have some securities risk & concerns in the past. You can circumvented a lot by installing a fresh copy of windows or Linux. They don't really havest data or track you like TikTok does. There is no algorithm, no influence on politics or feeding propaganda.

I think TikTok would be okay, if Android had a better sandbox environment (like GrapheneOS), but google also wants your data..

[–] [email protected] 7 points 19 hours ago

Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Reddit....

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

This thread has made me realize that while I was watching the hearings on it purely for comedy aspect, there were actually people out there being like, "Yeah that makes sense."

Love it when the government takes away our stuff. Please, take away more of our stuff. Love me that security theater.

If you don't like the app, just don't use it. Nationalism is a hell of a drug.

This has nothing whatsoever to do with data security and everything to do with other social media companies lobbying to eliminate a competitor, using anti-China sentiment and fear-mongering as a justification. It's all about the money.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Fine then, ban all the Chinese spy apps

[–] [email protected] 9 points 20 hours ago

I'd rather they just ban spy apps in general...but that's a "dream a little dream, it's never gonna happen" type of thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

And all the CIA ones.

And then block all cookies and tracking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago

Good call. Let's ban them both.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like Temu?

You mean like facebook and twitter.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, they love those, since that data goes to the US government instead of to the CCP

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that data goes to the US government instead of to the CCP

Going to blow people's minds when they find out Temu data also goes to the US government and Facebook data also goes to the CCP.

This shit is just a commodity. It's auctioned off at the bid rate. The NSA doesn't just lay claim to this data, it buys it. And these Big Data companies are only handing it over because of the absurd margins NSA (and MI5 and the rest of the Five Eyes) directors are willing to pay.

Your data isn't any safer because the parent company is owned by a foreign plutocrat. This is a big club and you ain't in it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago

Cambridge analytics

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They're right, we should regulate or ban then too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Please ban them, I beg of you, please...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

You can't spy on our citizens, that's our (and our corporations') job!

Signed, the US Government

[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm surprised so many people think this is a good argument. TikTok is a social media platform. Temu is an online marketplace. The potential to cause disruption within US society is completely different.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago (23 children)

Legally it is a very good argument. A law targeting a single company in name or effect is literally unconstitutional. It's called a "Bill of Attainder".

The counter argument is indicting Facebook because they never stopped selling information directly to the CCP.

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 174 points 1 day ago

Oh no, now we have to ban them all?? What a shame!

/s

[–] [email protected] 90 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But you can't charge me with murder! That guy committed it too!

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The argument here is more along the lines of, "you can't make a law that defines something as murder only when I do it."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 day ago (3 children)

selective enforcement of the law is a real issue. One of the reasons Donald Trump will likely never go to jail is the failure to prosecute nixon, reagan (iran contra, iran hostage crisis meddling), and Bush/Cheney(wmd fiasco)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

And one of the reasons POC are more likely go to jail (or even gets shot) for something a white man would be let free with only a warning… At least in the “free” land.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›