this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
28 points (81.8% liked)

Firefox

17302 readers
588 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Valentine's Day 2024, Mozilla came out with a piece critical of AI chatbots titled "Creepy.exe: Mozilla Urges Public to Swipe Left on Romantic AI Chatbots Due to Major Privacy Red Flags."

But before they found red flags, back in 2019, Mozilla promoted a workshop on a creepy, rainbow-washed, chatbot ecosystem where people identified as "queer" were required to bare their most intimate sexual thoughts.

From the post:

your... interactions will be recorded... you will occasionally be prompted with random survey questions

What kinds of questions did they randomly ask the people who would "queer the AI"? Creepy stuff like

Have you ever sexted with a stranger?
Have you ever sexted with a machine?
Do you remember the first time you were aroused by language?
Do you think an artificial intelligence could help fulfill some of these... needs?

The workshop providers guided people into establishing an intimate, sexual connection with the chatbot they could create.

How might we build trust with an AI?
How might we give it its own sense of desire?

Even the consenting participants in the workshop complained about the AI's creep factor:

it feels like the A.I. is gas-lighting you. Seems like a noncommittal sexting bot. It should at least be clear about what it’s trying to do.

The startup that Mozilla fostered for this panel ended up crashing and burning, but its creepier, worse brethren live on inside of Firefox 130, displayed as first-class options within Mozilla's chatbot options. I just thought it would be fun to take a trip down memory lane to see how many creepy red flags AI companies could get within Mozilla's view without ever concerning them.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm all for shitting on AI but the anti-lgbt language in this post was not needed in any capacity. Most if not all of the examples given could also apply to a straight person.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What's the language I used? I'd be happy to edit my post.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was specifically referring to the inclusion of lgbt being referred to as rainbow washing. I may have misunderstood the intention of your post, but my first read through and skimming of the article itself implied that it was a bad thing that they were trying to be inclusive. Like I said, all for getting rid of data collection and AI, but if its going to be around I would prefer it be representative of the entire spectrum of humanity and not just the conversvative straight monogomous/monotheistic majority

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You're right, I may have over generalized. To me, this looked like pandering...

As with over things I dislike, seeing queer representationin it is better than queer exclusion from it. Rainbow capitalism, in general, is better queer-excluding capitalism, for example... but I just found this particular workshop to be rather tasteless, especially when nothing came out of it.

(When I say nothing, I mean for at least 3 years there was no output... The people behind this workshop created a road map, then released a collection of NFTs, and then the supposed AI model that would be created from it never materialized AFAICT.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

That's fair, I'm glad to hear it was just a misunderstanding then, and yeah NFTs... LOL. I appreciate you taking the time to respond and being cool :)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Combine the sexting AI with VR porn and you lost humanity forever.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

To be uncomfortably honest, VR only covers sight and the AI is like the part of porn that everybody skips. Since you're not making a real connection with someone it feels meaningless. AI tries to give you exactly what you want, but that's not an authentic feeling relationship with give and take. Also I feel like there's still a tactile aspect that will be missing for a couple decades at minimum, and that should keep at least my monkey brain from becoming lost in the illusion...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Do you remember the first time you were aroused by language?

I do! Hadn't thought about it in at least twenty years. Thanks for the reminder, creepy chatbot that inspired this post. Thinking that an LLM could develop "its own sense of desire" was naive and seems ridiculous today, but I suppose their intentions were honorable as well as erotic.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

This is where your donations to Firefox go.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Such a chatbot exists already. There are numerous sexting games on the app store capitalizing this. You can make the chatbot in AI town into sexting as well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Mozilla is always late to the party.