this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
118 points (98.4% liked)

Games

31774 readers
1068 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cant wait to see how many C level people get canned!! wait.... none, you mean the directors that forced that BS to be this way wont even get tossed out....

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago

How dare my meddling not work out, you're all fired!

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 week ago

Gotta love seeing the people who simply did what they were told being punished for their bosses' mistakes

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 week ago

Big publishers might as well tell studios to end themselves when they‘re handing out these kinda projects, set up for failure IMO

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago

In the modern game industry, you get hit with layoffs even if you do well so it doesn't really matter what the quality of your product is in the end... You still get laid off.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, even if it had done well, I feel like they would still be laying people off anyways, just to pad out their end of year revenue presentations.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Every time. Seems more like companies aren't "hit with" them at all, more like.... They "get to participate" or "decide to indulge" in layoffs.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah, "hit with" has always been bizarre passive voice wording. The executives in charge were the ones who actively decided to lay off people.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

indulged in. When a company does not lay off people from the upper tier, they are indulging in layoffs.

"Hit with" implies an unavoidable, tragic, and forced event. They knew this would happen months ago when KTJL face planted. Videogame companies complain about the "cost of making games" but they're the fucks what spent the money. Maybe spend less on your marketing and budget, and when a game doesn't sell well it isn't a cataclysmic event that sinks the whole company.

But really, if game companies weren't constantly at risk to have implosions from bad decisions, the board wouldn't get their "please don't leave us" money. So really this always comes back to - fuck the management, and the board. Videogames are treated as products so here we are.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You can see this coming from an mile away.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At this point who isn’t laying off employees?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Headlines might as well just be "Ubisoft Reportedly Hit with Layoffs Due to 🤷"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Well Star Wars Outlaws just released so you might be onto something

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Paying for the suit shortsighteness I guess.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I heard they were going under and going to reform under an studio called bebop.