Media outlet: "X did this horrible thing"
Also media outlet: links directly to X, giving them free revenue for doing said horrible thing
this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
693 points (98.9% liked)
News
22851 readers
3438 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
If everyone could just delete Twitter, that'd be great. I don't get how people just prioritize "there are good memes sometimes" over staying out of the metaphorical Nazi bar.
I keep hearing "it is the only way for me to get critical weather updates in my area!" which at least would be better than being addicted to memes, but still seems to me like a shitty or bogus and/or ssuper rare reason.
Aren't there like a dozen weather apps?
Trying to be charitable, I'm guessing for some countries there aren't a lot of good sources. Maybe?
Definitely in the US and Europe there are a billion sources.
I've never had a Twitter account in my life and have had no issues finding weather forecasts or emergency notifications. That's a shitty excuse even by the shitty excuse standard.
I've deleted my account, but for twitter was nice for a run to get notifications on local road closures and weather alerts. Sigh.
Armature Porn Twitter's new lack of moderation and large userbase makes for a perfect storm.
The problem is no one has really made an effort to take over in the news/politics space. Meta basically decided Threads wouldn't be for that. Mastodon exists, but given it's nerd-based nature it's way more tech focused. Then there's Substack's half-assed effort, but they seem happy to focus on newsletter subscriptions for now. So there's competitors in microblogging generally, but there's still zero competition in news/politics.
I think it's a little like "no one goes there anymore it's too crowded". If people started posting on mastodon people would use it, and it wouldn't be so nerd-dense.
A friend and I had a minor fight about this. She was like "but all the good content is on Twitter" and I was like sometimes you have to be the change you want to be and suffer a little to make the world better. I think you can suffer through less immediate memes. She did not accept this.
But anyway yeah you're right that content needs to move. NPR and others could probably just switch, but none of them probably want to be the first to move.
That's true, the truth is that most people are lazy, if you are a company your social media person should be mirroring your stuff everywhere, it's just copy paste.
This is why misskey actually gained some traction over in japan, the artists there are mirroring their drawings there alongside twitter and pixiv.
It spent a lot or time carving its place for quick news updates and getting people off platforms is surprisingly hard.
I don't use it anymore but it's hard not to inadvertently find a news article that links to it.
It's this weird game of cat and also cat right now, I think. The media uses Xitter because people read their twats. People use Xitter because there's media to deliver twats. Until some other short-social platform hits a critical mass of popularity to replace it, that probably won't change much.
Mastodon?
hits a critical mass of popularity
Mastodon ain't that.
And never will be if Mastadon users have their way.
Fear of missing out is probably a huge driver here.
Ok, where do I get distilled news and incidents regarding covid and other infectious diseases/viruses spreading?
I would hope the CDC or other government agencies would have their own website and feed, and not rely entirely on a private entity that could go away at any moment.
Sure, the CDC, the NIH and the WHO are some sources. But what about a source that has information about what people are encountering?
Well, fediverse stuff like Lemmy and Mastodon come to mind as one solution.
Web forums were pretty sweet sometimes, too.
I bet there are other options that don't devolve into "some billionaire asshole owns this" and "value is being extracted"
This is an obvious abuse of power, and is clearly illegal, or at least it is in EU, but since this is about USA, it's probably alright, because USA is no longer a country of law. If it was, Trump would not still be walking around a free man, running for president.
I hope EU will never decline to the depths Trump and republicans have dragged USA.
It’s about accreditation in the US. It’s the same reason Fox News and Newsmax are classified as “entertainment.” Social media companies are not required to provide accurate information. They’re only held accountable by civil suits for slander or libel.
Well the way things are going, X may need to shut down in EU soon.
Even Brazil doesn't tolerate their bullshit anymore.
load more comments
(5 replies)
It is unsafe. Unsafe for Elmo's conspiracy/misinformation posts
Yet the same news sites keep linking to X and keep posting to X accounts.
What do you call someone who uses a fascist-owned platform with a fascist user base? Motherfuckers need to let that shit die already.
"BuT eVeRyOnE iS tHeRe!"
And will continue to be UNTIL YOU STOP USING IT
Amen!
load more comments
(7 replies)
you mean Xitter??
Xitter's full.
Of bots.
But Freeze Peach!
Unsafe for den of liars because people could hear something true.
Yet Twitter would probably sue other sites like Facebook if Facebook blocked them. Hypocrite
Turnabout’s fair play, everyone start blocking links to xhitter. It’s an unsafe site.
Blocking access during an election year to a well respected and accurate news outlet that has never been known to be "unsafe" seems like election interference to me.
Fuck Elon Musk.
What do you mean "caught"? Do you "catch" someone punching you in the face?
Yes you do. That's what the phrase "catch these hands" is referring to 😁