Pro-life, anti-gay, and anti-women? You know, Catholic stuff…
Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
That's stupid of them. They want to elect a guy who wants to enable police to fuck with them just because they look like people that might have crossed the border illegally?
That is false. Trump has never suggested what you said.
It’s doesn’t mention latinos in the article.
You realize that this would affect all minorites, ones living border states
What do cops like to do?
It’s not happening. It was ruled unconstitutional
Hmm, what's the ratio of of judges on the supreme court?
You first said it didn't happen and now you're saying it's unconstitutional. Gonna backpedal more?
That’s isn’t back pedaling. It’s the same statement. It’s not going to happen because it’s unconstitutional
I said the statement as stated was false and it is. Stop and frisk had nothing to do with illegal aliens or Latinos.