this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
57 points (87.0% liked)

Fediverse

27910 readers
9 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Are there any paid services for either Lemmy or Mastodon? Something where, given it is a subscription service, you would expect them to stick around long-term?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You don't need a subscription for instances to stay around long term - you need to use them. Instances without users shut down, naturally.

Instance owners don't do this to get rich or have someone else pay the bills I believe. They just want users.

And I think many of us hate subscriptions. :)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I understand, and for the most part, I agree, but I would still like to find a paid instance.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It seems like most instances have a donation link, so you could just donate on a regular basis.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I already do.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I prefer paying for a service rather than donating. When you pay for something, there is an expectation of a service in return. I think the fediverse could benefit from creating an economy for this sort of thing.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I use free, donation and paid services happily. Not against any model.

I do not think paid services are as stable as you are imagining. Lots of paid services go dark all the time. Even major ones.

I think the most stable would be to either run your own or pay someone to run one for you on a VPS. And for community stability, donate to various servers.

For long term, government/nonprofit funding would be good to have I think.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Market research to start their own paid instance likely.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That would be tough lol 😆

I mean one day maybe but it'll be like paying for Linux, which exists, but you have to work for it and propose an important benefit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

For what purpose? Why not a free one? I mean, if the price is right I'll host you one.

I've been considering hosting one myself, this would give me a push in that direction.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Absolutely, I think people are still thinking in the mindset of web 2.0. The fediverse is the internet before capitalism ruined it.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Not sure how tech savvy you are, but hosting your own server costs a few euros per month, you decide how long it stays up and you are chief in command.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Second this. And other instances would still be accessible. Even more so since lemmy.world (along with probably some others) is starting censorship, which wouldn't affect you, since you decide what you can see.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'd love to self host one for everyone but not allow communities. The idea would be that I federate with everyone no matter what and leave a what the user wants to sub to up to them. No censorship at all.

Not having communities would mean I don't have to worry about what I host and have other instances defederate with me. Plus, I have no interest in being mod, dealing with DCMA,user reports, etc.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You can disable communities on your instance as an admin, but you would need to disable uploading.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Would that allow someone to still post/upload on other communities? Honestly haven't looked into this at all. Was going to in a couple weeks when I have time to actually sit down and test

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

If a user from your instance posts to a community and wants to upload a file, that file will be saved to your instance. Not the instance in which the community is. Keep that in mind.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yep. My instance just has me on it and posting elsewhere works without issue. Anything I upload goes to my instance and federates out. It's really quite great not having to worry about the instance drama when big ones defederate from each other. I also turned off NSFW so I don't have to worry about any of that content (legal or otherwise) even hitting my server.

Here's an image of me making this comment via Sync for Lemmy

Edit: I have community creation locked down to admins, which everything disables them on my instance.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I did the same thing for the same reason. Admin approval for everything and I'm the only admin. Basically a personal instance for me and my friends if they're too lazy to host but want to try Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly. I went one step further and decided not to use my admin account as my main. I don't run around as root on servers so I try not to do that with apps. It's easier with Lemmy because once it's set up all the admin tasks hit my email.

I also wanted to avoid that vulnerability that hit Lemmy World a few weeks ago that was only possible because the server admin got their jwt stolen, which wouldn't have been so impactful if they weren't on the admin account.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I didn't read the story about how exactly he lost the jwt, but is it still as big of an issue since 2fa was introduced?

I guess existing jwt hashes will bypass 2fa, but I'm not super worried since my instance has 3 users.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I assume lemmy doesn't clean up images after X days/years? it would be pointless if it does... I'm a datahoarder but paying storage costs to host this stuff doesn't fit in the budget. I guess I have a lot of things to consider. Thanks!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah I haven't found anything for cleanup maintenance. Right now with just me my disk usage is increasing ~300MB per day. I'm debating purging stuff older than 30 days or something. The only stuff where my server is the source of truth is my profile and communities on my instance.

We'll see though, this is just a fun little side thing I'm not taking too seriously.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Commenting because I'm also interested

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your instance will be mirroring (essentially storing a copy of) content from instances it federates with. Depending on your local laws you might be held liable for this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, Thank you for this.

It sounds like I'll also have to store any images my users upload. I'm all for free speech and being anonymous online so I'll avoid logs and the like but I guess I'll have to read Canadian law to see if I want to risk running an instance or not. I cant afford a lawyer, nor do I want to deal with anything that goes along with that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The GDPR is also a whole other beast that could suckerpunch any instance at any point.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Have you heard of what happened to Rammy? The admin went MIA, a bunch of trolls set up shop, and they (as expected) got defederated from the majority of the network for being an unmoderated trashfire. Or earlier incidents regarding a bunch of open registration instances getting bot sign ups even if those accounts never did anything (to the best of my knowledge anyway).

If you are going to host an instance open to public registrations you need moderation. Even if it's just to keep the spammers and trolls at bay.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I may go with this option, but I really like the idea of helping create an economy. I suspect one of the Achilles heels of the Fediverse will be instances disappearing after users based their identity on a free server that the host eventually lost interest. Time will tell. I may be wrong. But also may be right.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

I think https://masto.host/ offers what you want, you can pay to host mastodon. I haven’t seen the same for Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

https://communick.com are intending to provide those services. (.news is their Lemmy server)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Good reminder that I still have to create an alt there

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

elest.io seems to be OSS focused host where you pay per hour and they offer an option to move to any other host.

https://elest.io/open-source/lemmy
https://elest.io/open-source/mastodon

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

social.digitalcourage.de and mastodon.green both are Mastodon server with a (paid) membership model.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As I recall, https://me.dm/ is Mastodon instance that were paid as part of Medium subsripction.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I wish they also had a Lemmy server. I’ve always liked Medium and have subscribed to them in the past. If they offered a lemmy servers as part of the whole package, that would be a big win for me. 

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›