pics

19395 readers

3 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

[OC] Milkyway, Andromeda, satellites and meteors (p.drkt.eu)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Dope af. Drop some deets.

[–] alphapuggle 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not OP, but I'd put money that this was taken on a Google Pixel

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Seriously? Here's a picture from my Pixel https://p.drkt.eu/2024/PXL_20240812_235442218.NIGHT.jpg

Here's a real picture of the exact same thing, same night, same conditions https://p.drkt.eu/2024/_MG_6658.jpg

Pixel phones have horrible sensors. My ancient Canon 450D produces better photos than my Pixel 6.

These pictures were shot on a 77D with the standard canon lens.

[–] alphapuggle 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is a picture from my pixel 6. The picture you linked for your pixel 6 doesn't look like you have astrophotography mode on (Night sight does a significantly shorter exposure compared to astrophotography)

I said it looked like it came from a pixel camera because it has that signature hue that I normally see taken with pixels

[+] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] alphapuggle 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I didn't intend to offend or insult your work, I've usually been able to look at the colors of the image and tell it's a pixel and verify in the comments, but I was wrong in this case.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sorry I got upset about this- I've thought about this conversation way too much and have been forced to come to terms with that I'm just unreasonable defensive about something I don't actually care about.

I also lied in a way; I know Pixels can take better pictures than the one I took if you put it on a stable tripod and I didn't do that. Defensive monkey-brain just thought it was a really good point to make since I had the picture, even if it was disingenuous.

Sorry, man

[–] alphapuggle 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I appreciate the apology, things get a bit heated online, I completely understand. Your picture is quite stunning, and I'm saving up for a camera so I can hope to take pictures like it and not rely on my Pixel.

My original look was on hotel wifi and I was unable to load the extensive detail in the image to see just how many stars there truly are visible. ~~If you don't have one already, a star tracker can help get rid of the smear from the earth's rotation, and let you get some longer exposures. I played around with one my roommate bought me for Christmas, but it doesn't make too much of a difference with phone photography.~~ Was looking through your other images and saw you mentioned one :P

Best of luck man, keep taking awesome pictures