this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
24 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1425 readers
306 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Broke: republican book banning

Woke: don’t ban books

Roke(o): On one hand I am a fan of regressive content bans, but allowing ChatGPT to decide which books get banned is how we get the basilisk!!!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exman tells PopSci that, even with ChatGPT’s deficiencies, administrators believe the tool remains the simplest way to legally comply with new legislation.

I mean it's certainly simpler to do things incorrectly. Can't argue with this logic

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It ain't honest but it's easy work!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@blakestacey "Each of [the titles of] these texts was reviewed using AI software"