Technology

58303 readers

13 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

171

New ALPR Vulnerabilities Prove Mass Surveillance Is a Public Safety Threat [automated license plate readers] (www.eff.org)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

So the very first assertion the article makes is that this creates a giant database of sensitive information (presumably the license plates).

That's just straight up not true? How can you write an article about this and make such a basic wrong assertion.

Any reasonable system would work as such: Scan plate -> is it allowed to be here? -> if noy store violation, if yes don't send data

EDIT:

It seems like they really do be scanning every single license plate and storing it for no reason.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

The locations of the license plates. Yes, people's location history is sensitive, and can be used for a lot of harm.

As for storing the information, that's where all the benefit comes from. To be useful, they have to be able to query the database for, eg., kidnapper's car and track where they've been. Without that you don't even have a debate of risk vs reward. It's not downside outweighing upside. It's all downside.