this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)

Woodpecker CI

49 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to the Woodpecker CI Community.

๐ŸŒณ This is a place for users, developers, and enthusiasts of Woodpecker CI to share, discuss, and learn about all things related to this open-source continuous integration tool. Whether you're troubleshooting, sharing pipelines, or discussing best practices, you're in the right place!

Rules

  1. Respect Everyone: Treat all members with respect. No harassment, discrimination, or belittling of any kind.

  2. Stay On Topic: Posts should be related to Woodpecker CI. Off-topic discussions will be redirected or removed.

  3. Search Before Posting: Avoid duplicate questions. Use the search function to see if your topic has already been covered.

  4. No Spam or Over Self-Promotion: Spamming and self-promotion are not allowed. Relevant content and contributions are welcome, but should not be overdone.

  5. Use Descriptive Titles: When creating a new post, use a clear and descriptive title to help others understand what it's about.

  6. Be Constructive: Criticism is welcome when it's constructive and intended to improve the conversation.

Resources

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
alx
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

OK, so, the project looks cool, and I'm grateful for any OSS. Let me put that up front.

However. I'm going to bitch a little about standards. Every single CI tool re-invents their own build syntax. It's always some .XYZ.yaml file in your project; they all look almost exactly alike and have essentially the same structure and operations, but they each feel the need to make things slightly differently, making them non-portable between systems.

Compare Woodpecker's .woodpecker.yaml to Github's .github/workflow.yaml, to Sourcehut's .build.yaml... they're almost, but not quite, all the same.

Please, for the love of dog, pick a fucking standard so I don't have to remember each and all of your special snowflake terminology for the same god-damned functions. There is no standard; not even in ForgeFed. So if you're developing a new CI system, please please just pick one of the existing ones - I don't care which, because they all do the same god-damned things - and use it. It'll be one less syntax I'll have to learn if I want to try your project.

Please. I'm literally begging you. Stop re-inventing this wheel: it's going to look exactly like all the other wheels, only be incompatible.

[โ€“] FizzyOrange 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ah I hadn't heard of Woodpecker. It's a fork of Drone which apparently is now proprietary.

Still it could do a better job of explaining why I would use it over e.g. Gitlab, which it seems to be nearly identical to. Also relying on Docker images means you can't target Windows or Mac anymore which is a pretty fundamental limitation for a huge number of projects.

[โ€“] pohart 1 points 6 months ago

You're not wrong, but Ithe developer isn't prepared to support and test my system I'd rather know straight away so I can pick something else.