this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
323 points (97.4% liked)

News

23014 readers
14 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 57 points 5 months ago (6 children)

I'm always glad to see the government go after a consolidated vertical monopoly like these assholes. It is part of the government's damn job, afterall.

But it kind of feels like it's a play for optics when there are much larger issues.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Its weird how a large group of people such as the federal government can work on more than one thing at a time.

Just because you dont know all the other things happening doesnt mean theyre not.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ticketmaster is an easy target. Apple, Amazon, Microsoft ,Google should have been cut to pieces years ago, yet here we are.

These companies have more revenue than some countries, this is mental and shouldn't happen.

So yeah, I get the cynicism.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

For such an easy target, Ticketmaster has operated with impunity for decades at this point. I agree it probably isn't the most pressing problem right now, but I am glad something is finally being done.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm glad they go after them, but I fear that they will use them as a scapegoat and do jackshit to other monopolies

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Dear US government, please stop climate change. I don't even go to concerts. I would feel bad about the gas it takes to get there

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

The current session doesn't even have a good record of doing one thing at once and political capital is not infinite. It's a legitimate concern to think we should be doing more important things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

And it's weird how these things almost always get killed by someone like Joe Manchin or the SCOTUS in spite of all the hard work of those good people. Try to pay more attention to what is actually going on.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I would have been receptive to the "there are larger issues" part but it might help to think of it like:

Instead of just an X-axis with "more/less important," add a Y-axis with "more/less political," a Z-axis with "more/less important to rich people," an A-axis with "simple/complicated" and so on, with a narrow N-dimensional space in which something can happen. All of these values are changing constantly and independently for every issue. We can affect some of these values, but the entire picture is usually out of any one person's control.

At this moment, fixing the concert monopoly is incredibly in the "maybe it can happen" zone. We just have to take it and run with it. Maybe, just maybe, ranked choice voting or taxing rich people or getting universal health care will make it to the "maybe it can happen" zone one day. It's not that, but hey, at least something gets a little better now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Again, I'm all for it (in spite of what all the zero chill reddit types ITT think). But my guess is, it will die in some Republican appointed court as planned. It's probably performative pandering. I would love to be wrong about this. The administration does seem interested in going after corporations and big pharma. Yet little of substance has been done. Just lots of posturing. I think folks are desperate for any kind of progress, which is understandable.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They are supposed to stop it looooong before it gets to this stage. Have one or more companies formed powerful trusts that give them significant power over a market? Break them apart and bust them open.

Instead, we twiddle our thumbs while bootlicking white knites tell you it’s not a monopoly because there are TWO trusts cornering entire markets.

It’s madness.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

you are like those karens at council meetings who complain "why we spend money on this instead of this??" and nothing gets done as result

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

you sound like reddit. try to lemmy more.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Every broken up company is a victory

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

At least it can set a precedent

[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 months ago

I'm sure some conservative brainworm judge will block this somehow just like when the Biden admin tried to cap credit card late fees. This country won't be fixed until the only way judges can receive RVs as bribes is if they end up under the tires.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago

Been calling that this would happen in 2024 (election year) for 3 years now. It's the one thing all Americans agree on. But no matter the reason it's a good thing. Hopefully something actually happens.

[–] dudinax 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I've clicked on this thumbnail twice thinking it was some weird fish.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

It is though?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

weird fish

Fetish

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Can we focus on the cost of food and housing before entertainment?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

He's doing that too.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If it's not dismantling that god forsaken monopoly, it's not enough.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

That is what they're doing though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

They’re already crashing though

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (4 children)

It feels like a bid to buy young people's votes back. I pray our youth are not so shallow.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

I'm as cynical as the next guy... But i feel like an administration that is willing to enforce antitrust laws (even if it is just for votes) is a good thing

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I said the same before when they were playing with marijuana laws. People didn't like it and even said things like "I want my politicians to do things for votes."

Then a couple weeks later, the administration reversed course.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

It's just one perpetual mindfuck. I dont want to live on this planet anymore.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Just add it on top of women's and lbgtq rights and suddenly it sounds less shallow.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Hasn't this been in the works for over a year now, with the congressional hearing a while back?

Feels pretty bad if 2/4 years of stuff doesn't count.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Support small indie bands. No need for big businesses crap.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Finally. They listened! I'm so glad they finally are tackling this important problem. It is far more important than starving millions of people in a foreign country to support genocidal fascists.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Yes! I’m so glad the Biden administration decided that they can only tackle one issue at a time!111ii1!

And nobody was ever hurt by a monopoly!!! Let’s abandon all regulations and become ancaps!!!

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Thank god they're focusing on the real issues

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

You might not be able to afford bread, but at least you'll get circuses.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I don't go to concerts and don't really personally care that much about ticket prices, but even from that position, antitrust issues are pretty much a real issue.

I do think that the framing of antitrust action as being specifically driven by the political layer is maybe obnoxious. The overwhelming bulk of federal Executive Branch activity is done by people who do not change from administration and whose actions do not change. A few people at the top whose job is oversight of them do change, but that drives a very small part of what the government does.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago