this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
175 points (97.8% liked)

Games

31990 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 70 points 6 months ago (5 children)

I don’t understand why you kill Tango after Hifi Rush was so well received. Wack

[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Because being received well isn't what Microsoft are after. They're after making as much money, as (un-)realistically possible, even if it means shutting down things. This isn't the first, and definitely not the last time. They've had more than a handful of studios with iconic IPs, that got absolutely annihilated after acquisition

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago

Being after well received titles is congruent with their Game Pass strategy. Being after as much money as possible would mean they probably should have charged more than $30 for one of the best games of the year.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago

Ten years to make one well received game. After two failed high budget titles, an attempt at a franchise, Ghostwire and a mobile game supported for only five months.

The studio head Shinji Mikami left shortly after Hi-Fi rush. So I would guess any projects they had in the works weren't interesting enough to justify the costs.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

It was well received but did it have microtransactions? Checkmate game enjoyers!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Just because the company you work for is making bank doesn't mean they won't fire you at the drop of a hat if they think they can make more by doing it.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 6 months ago

Tbh, the game wasn't even that good. After the first 5-6 hours most people put it down. It just becomes frustrating and not fun.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So Redfall was set up to fail, and you make those people fall on the sword, and then Hi-Fi Rush is a game people clearly want more of and could have stood to cost more than $30, and you let those people go too instead of hitting the ground running on a sequel? What is wrong with you, Microsoft?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Going by MS‘s track record the last couple decades, it‘s all business as usual. It‘s expected from them to eventually close everything down they incorporate into their ecosystem. Sometimes after draining it or letting it rot away, and sometimes sooner than later.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is what happens when we allow gigantic acquisitions.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’m generally against acquisitions for this reason. So many companies just want to be acquired instead of running a company.

I can’t think of one large acquisition that benefited consumers

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

I can’t think of one large acquisition that benefited consumers

Because consumers are not thought of when acquisitions happen. Shareholders and maybe regulations are thought of.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Maybe Microsoft could stop vacuuming up all of the studios that have built names and reputations based on putting out great games. They're going to ruin these companies. Damn corporations always coming in and wrecking stuff.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Don't worry, they kept BGS intact making mediocre-to-bad-but-still-lucrative games.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Give it time. Time is ticking for the big Bs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I dont even know what BGS is so they must suck.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Bethesda Game Studios, whose most recent releases were Fallout 4, Fallout 76, and Starfield.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh hahaha I know them. Yeah they suck, havent released anything good since like… Fallout 3? Maybe Doom 2016? I do mix uo the dev and the publisher in this case but wow the latest fallout games and starfield were utterly tragic

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Doom 2016 was made by id Software, owned by Bethesda.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

I'm definitely a little confused about Tango - I'm hoping we'll at least get more details come out about why Microsoft shuttered them. I mean, Ghostwire Tokyo was... whatever, and I could understand Microsoft not wanting to have them working on that kind of scale again any time soon. It wasn't bad by any means, but it was fairly expensive and perhaps didn't do as well as they hoped. But I'm surprised they didn't want to just downsize the studio and aim for another HI-FI Rush-esque game (or sequel).

But Arkane Austin being closed definitely makes sense. Not only was Redfall a disaster, but by the time Redfall released, 70% of the people who'd worked on Prey had left the studio. (Largely because the studio's president had left the studio just after Prey, I believe, rather than because of the Microsoft acquisition of Bethesda.) All that was really left was the name.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

If Microsoft shuts down Double Fine I'm going to riot

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Xbox is a reverse midas. Everything they touch turns into shit.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

Known as the "merdes touch."