this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
272 points (99.3% liked)

Not The Onion

13159 readers
728 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 103 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Can't they put a lien on the big, solid, not going anywhere asset the landlord happens to have in the country?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (2 children)

After paying the state, the tenant could sue the landlord for it and put a lien on the property.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Or, alternstively the tenant may be able to withhold rent until the debt is paid.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just take the money out of the rent. If the amount owed is $1000 and their rent is $1400, just pay $400 rent and call it square.

The landlord may try to kick up a fuss but at least you can say you "paid" your rent.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It was six years of property taxes my bro, it is like saying your rent is 1400 and tax is 10,000.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Then pay $400 a month for 10 months? Pretty simple math. A lot easier than trying to take them to court and paying a bunch of lawyer fees.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Assuming the tennant has enough to do this.
6 years of back taxes and acurred interest. Plus legal fees.

Can I get some of what your smoking, I apparently am just smoking sage...

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

This sounds like the judge is quite aware that it's bullshit, but the law says it's supposed to work this way so that's how it ends up being. As in, the law needs to be rewritten to adapt to modern times where you cannot just tar&feather the landlord.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'd love to be able to grab these people who do these things, sit them down in a nice sterile nondescript room far away from their support structures that give them confidence to do or say stupid things without someone correcting them, and just ask them, in simple terms, why they believe their actions are appropriate, and try to give them an example of a thing they can do instead, that would be the smart thing to do from both financial AND pr point of view.

For this, the people who contacted the tenant. "why do you believe you should penalize the renter, and not the property owner who did the illegal thing?" and every time they start giving me some bullshit beurocratic answer, just treat them the way we would be treated. With hostility and contempt. "oh come on Derek, we both know that's a bullshit excuse. Come on Derek, I like you. I want to help you out here. I'm just looking for the truth."

Until finally someone cracks and admits they fucked up and we're too embarrassed to admit it so they would rather see someone's life get trashed than admit to an error that could potentially threaten their yearly review.

This may have gotten a little personal...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

To defeat the Narcissist, you must BE the Narcissist.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Justice served. This was probably one of those deadbeat renters that wasn’t even tipping their landlord.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

I'm a bit drunk so i had to read your post 3 times before i understood, well played.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So. The tennant now pays rent to the government for a year and a half to fix the landlords fuckup right?

If the tennant is required to withold tax and they didn't the tennant also paid a year and a half in advance too so they also get a year and a half rent free only having to pay 25% for taxes.

Right? That's what is going to happen right?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

Pretty much, yeah. It'll be a problem if the tenant wants to move before then.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Hey, don't put this on David. He isn't involved!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 9 months ago

Landlords who evade taxes are some of the worst scum imo.

They're more than happy to charge people for using their things. They love that part. In fact, it's their favourite bit.

However, when a country comes along and says "yeah, so, about that whole charging people for using our stuff...thing" they'll act like they just asked to fuck thier mum.

Then they'll look you dead in the eye and claim its a moral issue, without a hint of shame.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

required to withhold and remit 25 per cent of the rent

Is this normal in Canada?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Can't speak for Canada, but in Texas, if your landlord doesn't maintain the property properly, you are allowed to withhold the amount of rent needed to pay for repairs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

This is the first I've ever heard of this and I've been renting for 16 years

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So, avoid moving to Canada. Got it!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Good call, we're fucked, can I move in with you?