this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
369 points (85.7% liked)

solarpunk memes

2597 readers
381 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Dictators and war are not unique to capitalism, they are just more profitable under it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah all these things existed long before capitalism

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They precede Capitalism, sure, but in our modern world it's easy to draw the line between those and Capitalism. Capitalism is very effective at incentivizing these.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Either way, lets eat the rich

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (6 children)

I'm not pro-capitalism but I'm curious what flavor of replacement you would choose.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Socialism. When properly implemented, it has a fair amount in common with capitalism but you keep what you earn, the disabled aren't left to die, and billionaires aren't an option.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The only one of these I can see socialism eliminating is unemployment. You can easily have dictators and wars with socialism.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Super capitalism. It's like capitalism, but superer.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Let's try Universal Basic Income with proportional representation and lobbying made illegal.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (5 children)

How about capitalism with the appropriate government controls? Break up monopolies and all anti-competitive practices. Use regulations to actually punish violators (and not with some small fraction of profits gained from that violation). Increasing tax rates for the super wealthy with the right tax shelter penetrating laws.

Sprinkle in some appropriate social policies and safety nets.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

I prefer Georgist economic democracy.

  1. All firms are structured as worker coops
  2. Land and natural resources are collectively owned with revenue derive from common ownership going out as a UBI
  3. Common pools of capital collectivized across multiple worker coops through a system of venture communes.
  4. Public goods and mutual aid institutions funded through some variant of quadratic funding

@memes

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How are dynamics of violence and power handled? Within such systems I'm always worried about elites, coercion, consolidation. How are binding decisions made, and how do we prevent those powers from bringing about the things mentioned previously?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Worker coops are firms that are democratically worker-controlled. Communes are democratic also.

Unemployment would be less worrying due to the UBI. Worker coops are committed to their workers so have incentives to train them. Also, worker coops prefer to reduce pay during downturns rather than employment.

Trade policy between communes would be set by free agreement. Quadratic funding helps resolve collective action problems such as for defense. Power concentration is severely limited @memes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Hmmm, I see. I guess I'm asking about the nonlegal basis of law, or the non-normative basis of norms. Is there good contemporary research about the social dynamics of this at scale? I remember Lenin writing about commune clusters, and there's mention of scaling in Das Kapital volume one.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

@jlou
A different thread: why only worker co-ops, and not also other sorts of co-ops?

I do wonder if, in order to encourage innovation, it's a good idea to allow non-coops in limited forms.

For example (and feel free to adjust these numbers), you can start a business and employ people but as soon as you pass €1 million revenue or 5 employees (whichever is first) then it has to become a co-op.

The existence of UBI, UBS and an economy that's majority co-ops should limit exploitation.

@memes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

@jlou Can you expand on number 3? Distributing resources and/or capital for investment is the part of economic democracy for which I've never quite seen a good solution.

I've read Schweickart, Dahl, Olin Wright and Hahnel and none of their proposed systems are that great IMHO.

@memes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Based on ideas of Dmytri Kleiner and Glen Weyl. The commune's members lease all their capital from the commune. This is structured for minimal administration from the commune. Each member coop self-assesses a price for their capital. They pay a recurring fee on that price. The member is required to transfer the capital to anyone that pays the self-assessed price. With the right percentage, the incentives to over-assess and under-assess cancel out. The fee can be used to invest in coops @memes

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Socialism. Worker Ownership of the Means of Production. Society run and owned by the Proletariat, for the good of the people, not profits for megacorps and large Capitalists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The fact that this is downvoted tells me that American propaganda is still going strong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think it's also a symptom of Solarpunk not being explicitly anticapitalist, it's an aesthetic and a goal that liberals can appreciate as they see climate change accelerating, but haven't done the analysis necessary to agree that Capitalism is one of the largest underlying causes of climate change.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah, we probably should have been working on that 50 years ago. Oh well

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (12 children)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Dictators, unemployment, and war are not because of capitalism. Do yall think the worlds problems started with the 16th century?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think you accidentally your first word. Lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

That's not funny, it's just propaganda

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

JFC people this meme hits almost all the antisemitic tropes. All it needs are the wings rubbing together.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Centralization not capitalism is the root cause of many issue and the more we blame capitalism the further we are away from reality.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Capitalism fundamentally has issues with it that cannot be solved via regulation. There is absolutely no reason why it's necessary that there be petite dictators in charge of Production, rather than democratic control.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›