this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
817 points (100.0% liked)

196

16800 readers
1957 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

Aren't those eagles, who are also predators?

Edit: found a fun fact about owls:

Owls eat other animals, from small insects such as moths or beetles, to large birds, even as large as an Osprey.

Whatever type of birds these are (maybe whiteheads?) they are in for a rude awakening someday!

[–] [email protected] 54 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Yes, that's the point I believe. (:

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Kinda makes you think

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Hmm, it would make more sense if they were a different type of bird, one thag might actually interact with mice instead of eating them. A bit redundant as is.

Oh well, 99/100 of Nathan Pyle's comics I love, so I'm okay that this one is a miss for me lol.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Is it because they’re bald, and we shouldn’t make fun of bald people?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago

Indeed they are

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I thought they were Seagulls and was confused.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you've ever heard the call of an eagle it sounds a hell of a lot like a seagull

The fact that in a lot of media eagles are dubbed over because they don't sound "cool" enough makes me giggle every time I hear it

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Seagulls are also predators. Not quite apex, but fairly high in the chain.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that make more sense? Eagles wouldn't talk to mice, they'd eat them.

I think a songbird would have made sense since they share bird feeders with the mice lol

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Let's reframe this a moment -

Wealthy person 1 "you ever go hungry?"

Wealthy person 2 "no, not at all"

Wealthy person 1 "I have no idea what that poor person was complaining about."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Interesting interpretation, Nathan Pyle doesn't usually do political comics though. I think this one is just supposed to be fun.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Nathan Pyle doesn't usually do political comics

For good reason lol. But still, not sure how someone could make this and not see something more in it.

[–] AdmiralShat 12 points 10 months ago

That's apart of the joke, yes

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

Good comic.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

In my first readthrough, I got Of course [he is]. Never bothered me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

What a great visualization. Sometimes it can be hard to relate to the issues others encounter, but that doesn't mean those things aren't problems just because you don't run into them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Toddlers aren't safe either.