41
Also has a TDP of 620W.
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
41 points (97.7% liked)
PC Gaming
8550 readers
938 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Ah, Perfect for scrambling eyes
Edit: Eggs
Could probably cook an eye on it too
Nice. In a few more generations my home office should be able to double as my boiler room.
That is what surprises me with this announcement: we moved a while ago from a more powerful, limited number of cores to smaller, more numerous, and less consuming cores. Power consumption increases to the square of the frequency of the processor, so what is the advantage of moving away from that model?
Headlines.
No one should buy this.
Power meter goes brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
Remember when their clock speeds went up every year?
Moore's Law is dead. :*(
Nice. Should be hot enough to make coffee
It is P4 vs Athlon all over again.
Didn't we see something similar in the fx days, with amd being the loser?
Intel adopted a fast release cycle after the Netburst P4 days. They were able to stay dominant until they dumped that strategy in like 2017.
Don’t worry about missing out on the performance of the 14900KS for gaming, though, as the cheaper Ryzen 7 7800X3D is likely to be just as quick, if not more so, in many games.
Sounds great, but based on what?
*AMD releases 6.9GHz
Ayoooo
Fastest ever stock CPU sure. But I believe there was some old AMD CPU that got overclocked to more than 8Ghz!