Science Memes

11441 readers

572 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

857

Zero to hero (mander.xyz)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

131 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It is a natural number. Is there an argument for it not being so?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (2 children)

no it's not

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago

Well I’m convinced. That was a surprisingly well reasoned video.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Thanks for linking this video! It lays out all of the facts nicely, so you can come to your own decision

[–] kogasa 4 points 7 months ago

There can't really be an argument either way. It's just a matter of convention. "Natural" is just a name, it's not meant to imply that 1 is somehow more fundamental than -1, so arguing that 0 is "natural" is beside the point