this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
504 points (99.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54500 readers
640 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 64 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So I guess that would make it more resilient agains Nintendos efforts to destroy all emulators?

[–] [email protected] 48 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Hosting is part of it, but didn't they legally restrict Yuzu's developers from working on the emulator? That seems to be a far greater obstacle to me.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

They convinced the yuzu team to officially not work on yuzu anymore, but I guess the devs could still work on it using their private account or in form of another another team. The major problem was thir patreon locked pre-releases

But I’m not a legal expert

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Also, I think it's safe to assume what you have provided is not legal advice.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Can't they work on it now as its hosted via p2p? How would they know

[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago

I would think the devs wouldn't want to risk it. Assuming they are barred from working on it, if they slip up & reveal something about themselves while working or committing, they may be targeted even harder.