this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
1063 points (99.0% liked)

People Twitter

5189 readers
2334 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 212 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I feel so bad for the younger folks these days.

Way back when, if Google couldn't find it and we did some good Google Fu, it probably wasn't readily available online.

Now, you know it probably is there, just buried in nonsense generated purely by layer after layer of people's selfishness. And they never even knew it could be any other way.

[–] [email protected] 125 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's a sick joke that we've celebrated being in the "information age" for the last 20-25 years, and now that information is being obfuscated by various means again.

SEO, censorship, paywalls.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 6 months ago (1 children)

it's not the information age, it's the data age.

Information implies usefulness. Data is just data. Could be right, could be wrong, who knows.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You could say the same thing about information, though. Information doesn't necessarily imply usefulness. There is an infinitude of information in the universe which is useless to us.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I guess I should have said "correctness" instead of usefulness

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Now we have graduated to the disinformation age:-(

img

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Maybe we should start calling disinformation "Lore"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

lore-posting time

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Google has also disabled some of the search operators that made refining results more useful.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Like I don't think the minus operator to exclude a search term works anymore.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Which is the most important one for me. It's also really useful for filtering SEO crap that has 50,000 keywords attached to every page.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is that a rollout thing? I was just using it last night

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

It really breaks when you're using it multiple times in a string or combining it with other operators.