Linux

48332 readers

937 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

249

Which communication protocol or open standard in software do you wish was more common or used more? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

331 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Whether you're really passionate about RPC, MQTT, Matrix or wayland, tell us more about the protocols or open standards you have strong opinions on!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

PGP/GPG. I would like to see the web of trust take off. Also I love the aesthetic for anything that's been signed, and would like to see blog posts everywhere be nested by long blocks of random symbols.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

PGP has a bunch of limits (and I'm saying that as a cryptography nerd). We've learned a lot of things since the 90's and the better solutions are specialized encryption protocols like MLS / Matrix (E2EE group messaging) and running all kinds of other protocols on top.

The portable identity part of PGP can be handled by something like DID documents which works more like Keybase used to do (depending on specific implementation) where your declare a list of supported protocols with public keys and accounts under your control, so people can still achieve the same effect of using a strong cryptographic identifier to communicate with you, but with forward secrecy supported by default and much lower risk of stuff like sidechannel attacks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah but the aesthetic!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

key signing and web of trust is pretty cool but i'm somewhat opposed to it on a fundamental level. Let me decentralize my shit and mind my own business if you feel what i mean.

Anything that's relatively centralized identity wise is not something i'm a huge fan of right off the hop.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Let me decentralize my shit...

Isn't that why it's a web of trust, and not a center of trust? I think you might be confusing that with public key infrastructure.

Also, you can't decentralize your shit without a second party. That's kind of the point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Isn’t that why it’s a web of trust, and not a center of trust?

yes, but it's still a trust, i don't consider that to be fully decentralized. It serves a purpose don't get me wrong, but i won't be signing my online profiles using WoT keys anytime soon.

The web makes it decentralized, which is accurate, though i tend to use decentralize way more aggressively on a level local to me. I suppose it's probably more dis-integrated, than anything. But whatever.