Asklemmy

43402 readers

1584 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Who would you save between your cat and your worst enemy? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been discussing with my sister (a big fan of her cats) about what lives we would save in an emergency. I think a human live is worth more than an animal's no question asked but she thinks otherwhise. So to end this discussion I'm writing here.

Who would you save between your cat and your worst enemy?
What if it was between your cat and a stranger?
Why?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not sure why you're being downvoted. It's legitimate to wonder in what ways "all life" matters. It wasn't an accusatory question.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I didn't mean it as a jab. I just thought it was an interesting assertion that "a life is a life" in this context. Seemed a strong stance, and I wondered how far they carried it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Honestly, I don't think eating meat is wrong, as long as you actually use it for food. But Killing for fun or for trophies is wrong because it's wasting a life. It's kind of a "use the whole buffalo" philosophy I Guess. I think factory farming is wrong,
I'm a big fan of lab grown meat,
I learn heavily towards seafood but I don't abstain from red meat.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Haha, we responded at like the same time lol. Wild.

And fair on all counts, but it does seem at odds to an "a life is a life" position, no?

Like, I'd assume you would be more upset if they were farming humans for meat than you are that they raise chickens and cows for meat, no?

And are you against all farming, or just factory farming? If an old school farmer raises a cow in a field, and then kills and eats it, is that acceptable?

And are fish's lives not valuable? Less valuable than a chicken's or a cow's? It's still a life, no?

I'm truly not trying to be combative. I'm actively trying to understand how to jive these two positions.