Asklemmy

43818 readers

1074 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

How to make instances have even less power? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The federated concept is nice. But I feel like what will happen in the end is that most of the content will end up on few instances. This still gives power to the owners of these instances, and if they delete the instance a lot of people would lose accounts?

What would be your ideas to improve this and have less centralization?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Make it trivial for users to move their accounts between instances, and very hard for instance admins to block. Ideally it would be possible to migrate an account even after an instance shuta down, but that is probably impractical to implement.

We also need to consider how to mitigate the threat to communities (I think that's the term. Lemmy's equivalent of subreddits). If big communities are tied to specific servers then we have the same issue with server admin power.