this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
300 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
16 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 105 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Here is an uncropped version of the image: [NSFW] https://mypmates.club/1972/Miss-November/Lena-Soderberg

Considering this it's more understandable that it's controversial.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I don't see anything weird here...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

The weird part is in the mirror.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Streisand effect in motion. Me and a million other people get to see this for the first time today.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

But the idea isn't to keep anyone from seeing it. The idea is simply for a lusty image not to be used in academic papers (probably also better that it's not used in college classes too).

I love pictures of scantily clad women more than almost anyone. But even I can agree that the Lena image sends the wrong message to women joining the field.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

That's fair and you are right, but I'm also pointing out a side effect this is causing. I find it interesting is all.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

It's not a lusty image if nobody knows what the full picture looks like. Hence the reference to the Streisand effect.

What I'm not seeing in this thread is the reason why this picture is so over used.

One reason is that it's the perfect image to test graphics manipulation algorithms like compression for example. It has all the characteristics you want to check for: various textures, gradients, lightening... It's like the benchy (3d printing) of image compression.

The other reason is that once it established itself as the reference image, it was easier for researchers to compare algorithms and make sure the author doesn't cheat by cherry picking a picture where his algorithm is clearly better.

Researchers were used to see the common pitfalls of compressions algorithms on this image (the fur for example).