this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
369 points (99.7% liked)
Arch Linux
7763 readers
14 users here now
The beloved lightweight distro
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why does xz exist anyway?
It provides
liblzma, an implementation of the lzma compression algorithmThat's why I use dz instead. It provides ligma. It's a much better compression algorithm.
Why does lzma exist anyway?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPj_dILDK6I
This looks interesting, I'm gonna watch it
I don't understand what you mean by this question... Because someone decided to create it?
Exactly. People should just use zip for their compression libraries. Way more efficient
What are you talking about?
Zip and WinRAR (the paid version obviously) being a good way to do compression over ssh, clearly
It is a compression library that is in the dependency tree for a large number of other packages though not as many as zlib which is in practically everything.
xz development appears to have been compromised by some organisation in a long game targeting sshd in Debian and derivatives. Debian maintainers have a nasty habit of adding lots of patches to upstream sources which occasionally have unintended consequences. I am a long term Debian user but I wish they would stop doing this. Thankfully arch generally doesn't modify upstream as much as Debian and arch sshd doesn't link in the backdoored library.
Ah I see. Are there any reasons why people would choose to use xz over zlib?
It compresses much better, by a lot, as zlib/deflate is an ancient algorithm made back when computers only had a few megabytes of ram.
Nowadays though, zstd seems to be replacing both of them, as at max level it compresses about as well as xz while also being faster. Nevertheless, many programs link against all the common compression algorithms (xz/zlib/zstd/bz2) to support everything
Ah I see
One purpose I know of is to snoop on users
Stop posting