this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
113 points (77.3% liked)
Games
31807 readers
1132 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I agree, except for some of the bonus puzzles (particularly in 1) requires some out-of-the-box thinking, sometimes literally by breaking out of the puzzle you're in taking puzzle pieces with you. All the basic puzzles I agree are straightforward, but some of the bonus tings require you to look for extra details that may not be part of the puzzle exactly. I think this is done particularly well in 1, as the story is about thinking for yourself so you have to start thinking about the puzzles in a different way. In 2 most of the bonus things are done exactly the same each level and you just need to figure out how to connect them to other things in the map. Usually they don't require "breaking" the puzzles to complete, even though this is still possible and allows for other options to solve some puzzles.
Even those are generally "obvious" as level design makes it obvious there are interactables not inside a puzzle or that use tools that aren't part of that specific puzzle. The narrative is what pushes you to think "... what if I take this out of the puzzle room?" but many puzzles outright teach you those skills with the kill fields.
As opposed to "You should have looked to the left while walking between these areas and realized that if you lined up the level geometry it would make an arrow"