No Stupid Questions
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
view the rest of the comments
Why would this be true?
Each state has its own jurisdiction. New York has no jurisdiction in Florida. If Florida said no, New York would have to take them to court. It is easier just to take the New York properties as they have jurisdiction in New York.
State are supposed to abide by other states court orders but they don't always.
https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/news/trump/2024/03/21/are-trump-properties-in-south-florida-at-risk-of-seizure-by-new-york/73054325007/
Palm Beach Post suggests the Full Faith and Credit clause of the constitution disagrees with you.
The Sun Sentinel does suggest James would have to ask Florida courts to grant the lien or the foreclosure.
All the other major news sources barely contend with the idea that a state could simply deny a lawful court order of another.
I already explained that part to you. They are supposed to do it, but that does not mean Florida will comply.
The Blue States do it over abortion requests from the Red States. It's not that uncommon.
The difference is that NY wants to move quickly, and being tied up in court for months wouldn't suit their goal.
It's worth citing that this would not be routine for you or me. It would not be normal for any state to delay this and plenty of states would not
His golf courses in Scotland are up for seizure, somehow I doubt that "States Rights" trumps international or federal law.