this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
678 points (99.4% liked)

Games

31990 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Valve announced a replacement feature for both Family Sharing and Family View. Currently in beta.

Features:

  • up to 5 members
  • game sharing
  • parental controls
    • allow access to appropriate games
    • restrict access to the Steam Store, Community or Friends Chat
    • set playtime limits (hourly/daily)
    • view playtime reports
    • approve or deny requests from child accounts for additional playtime or feature access (temporary or permanent)
    • recover a child's account if they lost their password
  • child purchase requests
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Sigh... I'm getting tired of the Valve apologetics in every thread. They make good products, yes. They also abuse their market share to implement anticompetitive policies. The first doesn't absolve them of the second.

Truth is, no one has any idea what it would look like if there were actual competition among the PC games platforms. Steam may be the best possible world, or maybe we don't know what we're missing.


To learn more about Steam's anticompetitive practices:

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

"Platform Most Favored Nation". It's a type of clause in platform/marketplace agreements that prohibit a seller from listing their product for a lower price on a different sales platform. Specifically, it prevents selling on a different marketplace with lower fees (e.g. Epic Games or a publishers own website) and passing the difference as savings to the consumer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Oh, I hadn't read of it in that form, thanks!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Doesn't Amazon have the same stipulation on every item listed on their site?

Edit: I think I misunderstood you here. I thought Amazon's game division was complaining about Steam. That would have been very hypocritical.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Epic gives me free games and I still don't like them... The "problem" is Valve is Steam-rolling the competition because people want to give them money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yep. Because honestly, Steam is better than Epic in almost every way. When you want to buy a particular game X, you get a lot more from your purchase if it's on Steam (workshop, friends, multiplayer, etc.). There is strong inertia and network effects that keep us all preferring Steam.

Epic can't compete with the Steam experience. But if Epic was able to list everything 18% cheaper (the difference in fees between Epic and Steam)—then they would rightly be able to compete on price.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

I understand now and that does make sense. No point in undercutting your competition if you can't pass those savings to the customers.