this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
778 points (92.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26305 readers
17 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Alternatives?

I see 2:

  • full hegemonic domination of one nation state where everyone gets their basics met. Star trek style.

  • intense local tribalism where you're doing a whole lot more defending your land than you are now

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Or maybe there’s a dozen alternatives that could work better and both of us are staring at this from the bottom of a pro-hierarchy well that we’ve been stuck in ever since one guy convinced another one he should be in charge.

I don’t have a full solution, I just want us to be flexible enough to figure one (or more) out.

“The international ideal unites the human race”

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

One guy will always convince another of that. If the other guy disagrees, well, time for sticks and stones.

My point is you either go small, and groups self assemble however you want, but you'll have many neighbors who might not see it your way.

Or you go big, and everyone's efforts go to one shared goal, and everyone is a equal "citizen". Ideally with collective shared goals folks are doing ok.

Or you go medium, which is what we have now. Some groups are positioned and prepared to do good stuff, and others are fighting with and nail just to hold it together. There's gonna be friction with neighbors, like with "small" but the problem is "mediums" got some real big sticks and stones.

There's no right answer and I obviously didn't cover everything. But without groups of some kind, people will get picked off. There's no period of human history that disagrees with me.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Realists?

Provide a single example of anything aside from what I described, in any period of human history that both:

  • did not maintain power through economic or just militaristic dominance of their local region

  • did not experience conflict with their neighbors.

They either had cohesive, hegemonic domination within their borders and geographic separation from rivals, or had challenges with bordering nation states.

I personally hope for a star trek future

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is this like a sound scientific theory that has some relevance to modern times? I could list off a myriad of "this thing has never existed in human history" making current times unique and possibly different when looking at cultural nuances. I get what you're saying totally, but this is a new era of history with the formation of Alliances like NATO and the EU that has really just started in regards to our span of time. Also, we tend to only hear about the "bloody" years of a society. One war can outshine hundreds or thousands of years with prosperity and peace so the whole doom thing seems like fear mongering.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Mainly I'm highlighting that humans are tribal creatures and without some global engagement and unification, nation-states and conflict would always exist

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'd go for the second, with pleasure. Better spend my time fighting for hometown than working for a big profit-driven company.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

You'd be fighting a whole lot. Think Afghanistan hamlets

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

anarchism, i.e. bottom-up democracy and federal structures. Read up on Rojava for example.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

How is a bottom up democracy with federal features not a government? All governments have borders, unless you're suggesting* a global system

Edit all governments with borders are effectively nation states.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A government is imo not bottom-up by my definition. There is no formal "citizens of Rojava" , they are just members of their communes. There is no federal police force.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Just looked that up. It's absolutely suffering from the things I mentioned, including military conflict with their neighbors.

It's a place with borders, that hopes to set internal law , and maintain itself. That's a nation state. It is defined as a "federated semi direct democracy" and has a legislature "Syrian democratic council"

That's a new, embattled nation