this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
88 points (92.3% liked)
Asklemmy
43911 readers
979 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
In what circumstances would you consider murder a smart choice?
When someone is about to testify about Boeingβs safety violations.
Someone trying to kill me or my kids. Maybe I'd still die but I'm taking that person with me.
You could stop them without murdering them
There's a broad spectrum between reason and murder. You could tackle them, or bonk them with a stick, or distract them with shiny objects.
It's really hard to say without being in that specific situation, but if someone was literally trying to kill me my only goal would be to put them down and make sure they're not getting up to try again.
I mean stuff like knocking them out, tieing them up etc. not just flat out murder people. What the hell?!
It's fascinating how often this actually is a viable option.
Maybe in some instances of self-defence?