Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
You actually do. If we used the same criteria we used for Trump then Biden is a rapist as well.
So then OJ isn't a murderer, is that your stance?
No, OJ is not a murderer. He was acquitted of a crime.
Tara Reade. There is more evidence that Tara Reade was assaulted by Biden than Trump assaulted Jean.
So the civil jury that found him guilty committed libel? If someone is found guilty of voluntary manslaughter, you think that means people in casual conversation couldn't call them a murderer?
If you want to call biden a rapist because you think Tara Reade's account is credible, that's fine. Go for it. But people are allowed to look at the facts as they see them and make judgments. And just because a jury doesn't convict someone that doesn't mean they didn't commit the crime
I don't know any educated people who would. He was not convicted of murder, and legal libel is a low standard to meet.
There is zero evidence that Trump committed rape on Jean. She doesn't know the most basic facts. I get you dislike Trump, but banana courts are just damaging to the whole country.
Hahaha. You don't know ANYone "educated" that would call someone who intentionally killed someone, but was convicted of a lower crime, a murderer. Ok sure.
No one's talking about a court, we're talking about casual discourse between civilians. Oh wait, except for the court that found trump responsible for sexual abuse
What does this even mean? The jury found him liable for sexual abuse. What crazy mental gymnastics are you doing to suggest that they "agreed with the lack of evidence"?
Any reasonable person with a hint of intelligence would have told her to go pound sand. Basically her evidence was she said it happened. Nothing else.
There is no way to defend yourself from such insanity.