Conservative

384 readers

66 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

-29

Americans split on who they trust to do a better job as president: POLL (abcnews.go.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

65 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hahaha. You don’t know ANYone “educated” that would call someone who intentionally killed someone, but was convicted of a lower crime, a murderer. Ok sure. What lower crime was he convicted of? I am not aware that OJ has been convicted of any crime.

No one’s talking about a court, we’re talking about casual discourse between civilians. Oh wait, except for the court that found trump responsible for sexual abuse Trump is legally libel for sexual abuse. The jury agreed with the lack of evidence and still came to the conclusion it happened. I don't deny that at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The jury agreed with the lack of evidence and still came to the conclusion it happened. I don’t deny that at all.

What does this even mean? The jury found him liable for sexual abuse. What crazy mental gymnastics are you doing to suggest that they "agreed with the lack of evidence"?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago

Any reasonable person with a hint of intelligence would have told her to go pound sand. Basically her evidence was she said it happened. Nothing else.

There is no way to defend yourself from such insanity.