this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
351 points (100.0% liked)

Actually Useful AI

2011 readers
7 users here now

Welcome! 🤖

Our community focuses on programming-oriented, hype-free discussion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) topics. We aim to curate content that truly contributes to the understanding and practical application of AI, making it, as the name suggests, "actually useful" for developers and enthusiasts alike.

Be an active member! 🔔

We highly value participation in our community. Whether it's asking questions, sharing insights, or sparking new discussions, your engagement helps us all grow.

What can I post? 📝

In general, anything related to AI is acceptable. However, we encourage you to strive for high-quality content.

What is not allowed? 🚫

General Rules 📜

Members are expected to engage in on-topic discussions, and exhibit mature, respectful behavior. Those who fail to uphold these standards may find their posts or comments removed, with repeat offenders potentially facing a permanent ban.

While we appreciate focus, a little humor and off-topic banter, when tasteful and relevant, can also add flavor to our discussions.

Related Communities 🌐

General

Chat

Image

Open Source

Please message @[email protected] if you would like us to add a community to this list.

Icon base by Lord Berandas under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BatmanAoD 53 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's actually quite amusing to me that Wikipedia is an authority on "reliability". It makes perfect sense, but can you imagine explaining that to a public school teacher twenty years ago?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Try explaining anything to a public school teacher lol. They always think they know better.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

They’re not an authority though. They might want to be but they’re not.