Technology

58303 readers

13 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

165

Google sued for $2.3bn by European media groups over digital ad losses (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 52 points 8 months ago (3 children)

When will punishment stop being attached to a hard number and be a percentage of the company's worth. Shits maddening.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago

While I'd love a percentage based fee, this is a damages suit, so it should be actual damages these people are owed, as determined by the court. A percentage just doesn't make sense here unless punitive damages were also on the table.

In principle I agree, though, breaking the law should not be an affordable "cost of doing business".

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

These companies shift gains and losses around so much that they would evade any punishment

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

“As you can see your honor, we actually lost 400 million last year. Negative profit. It looks like you actually owe us money when you calculate the proposed fine...”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Surly u can make it the value of a percentage of shaires. The primary purpose of any company is the keep the shairholders happy either pay ur fines or fail ur primary purpose.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Are you basically saying 'When will corporations stop profit seeking?'

Because the answer to that is 'never by choice'.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No. Not at all. That's not what he said and only tangentially related. I expect a re-read and full write up by morning young man :p

[–] [email protected] -5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't even care you are being sarcastic, blocked.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Enjoy being an ignorant and poorly comprehending prick instead of taking a joke ig

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

LMFAO that was easily the funniest exchange I've seen on lemmy