this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
357 points (98.1% liked)
Technology
58303 readers
8 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No, just disappointed.
Can you point out an example of anyone here who roots for the establishment? It's kind of contrary to the purpose of federation.
EG 2 weeks ago, there was a post that had people calling for making robots.txt legally binding. Very disappointing.
How in the world is people wanting giant tech companies to stop violating every single technological oriface for every bit of data they can get their hands on to feed to their AIs dissapointing?
Lol. Yeah, sure. Tech companies would be accused of circumventing robots.txt. It's not like being able to monopolize information would benefit them or anything. It's not like that's not already happening.
When you make harsher laws against trespassing, you're not locking in the people in the big mansions.
I'm just disappointed by the complete absence of any rational thought.
"They already do it, so we should just let them" and then getting mad at the people trying to stop them is kind of a psychotic take. Unchecked corporate power is how we got to this point and refusing to ever hold them accountable is not going to make it better. Genuinely, what NON MALICIOUS reason could there even be for a small company to need violate robots.txt, and how on earth would that give them any leg up over google?
And you come at ME with "abscence of any rational thought". Truly vile.
I can tell that this subject is very emotionally challenging for you, though I don't understand why. Should you be able to tell me, that would be appreciated.
I don't think you want a rational answer to your question, so I won't bother. Correct me if I'm wrong and I will deliver.
You're very disappointing.