this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
338 points (94.9% liked)

Funny

6827 readers
342 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The difference is the reason they were “just there”

13s companions were literally just sitting around when she literally fell into their laps.

All the other companions of the modern show have had a compelling stories for how the doctor found them. These people were literally just milling about like they were waiting for someone to fall through the roof and change their lives.

4 is definitely unreasonable for a show known for its character arcs. How am I supposed to connect with any of these characters when they’ll get an average of a couple minutes of dialogue per episode.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

13s companions were literally just sitting around when she literally fell into their laps.

They were in a train going home...

Rose was "just working". So was Martha. Donna was "just getting married". Amy was "just sleeping". Clara was "just babysitting". Bill was "just going to school". See how you can do that for literally any companion? The whole point of the characters is that The Doctor drops into their normal life and whisks them away.

And honestly, your "requirements" are just absurd. If you can't "connect" to these characters over several seasons, that's a you problem. Maybe try to meet the show where it's at instead of being so closed off to anything outside off your demands.

*forgot to add Amy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Nah, I’m an adult, I like things that I like and don’t waste time on things that I don’t.

Watched like 5 episodes and gave up on the piss poor plots and 2d companions.

If you enjoyed it, good for you. But I am always confused by people like you who feel the need to defend the virtue of a show just because someone on the internet disagrees with the quality of content you enjoy.

I didn’t like it, you did. I have watched 5 hours of a show and decided it wasn’t worth my time, you telling me otherwise isn’t going to really change my mind. I have better ways to entertain myself than wasting time on a show I know isn’t for me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I'm not saying you have to like it, and I'm not trying to "defend it's virtue". I'm pointing out the lack of consistency in your critique, which, objectively, makes no sense.

Honestly, it'd be great if people would stop shitting on 13's run for such shallow reasons, like there's "too many companions", rather than just saying they don't like it. You don't. That's fine. I didn't like Capaldi much, but I'm not blaming his "lack of companions" or the size of his TARDIS or something else equally asinine.