this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Git

2889 readers
2 users here now

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

Resources

Rules

  1. Follow programming.dev rules
  2. Be excellent to each other, no hostility towards users for any reason
  3. No spam of tools/companies/advertisements. It’s OK to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the community should not be self-promotion.

Git Logo by Jason Long is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Ategon
canpolat
jnovinger
3
Fork or Mirror existing git repository for a similar but different project? (self.git)
submitted 1 year ago by nieceandtows to c/git
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I have a repository on github for a project that deals with importing/processing/sending reports to clients. There is now talk of creating a similar application for a different set of users, without the import part, but multiple send parts. The existing code base already has 90% of what the new application needs (and some extra that is not needed for this new project).

Should I fork the existing project and make the new project, or should I use the 'import project' function on github to create a new project based on the old project, or use the commandline to mirror the old project into a new project, or something else?

In future, there might be more projects that build on top of one of these projects with their own customizations, so I'm looking for a good approach that I can leverage again in future.

Please advise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nieceandtows 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Got it, thanks. In the past, in similar situations, I would usually just create a new blank repository and manually copy the files I need from the old repository. Just wanted to see if there is a better/proper way

[–] verstra 2 points 1 year ago

Oh manually copying is worse than the other three options, because it will not retain the history of commits