this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
558 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
14 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Healthcare worker, chiming in:

Yes please.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Ah yes, just how sensitive information should be sent. In clear text over the internet.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's not in clear text, you have to use a decent OCR

[–] SheeEttin 1 points 10 months ago

Or a good old fashioned Mk I eyeball

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Or you can just read it directly. Just need some light.

It's actually better than plain text stored on a Hard Drive/ CD/ Floppy et c., which requires corresponding reading devices, format parsing systems, a display to show it and an appropriate power source, after which you can consider using a human to use the data (or remove the monitor and convert data into other data, in which case, you need another output device/network).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Needing a human in the loop kills automation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I'd rather not automate convicting random people.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/aug/22/google-csam-account-blocked

Besides, what I said earlier would be more of a concern for preservation of information in case of civilisation level disasters.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

No, we're automating HIPAA violations for nefarious purposes. Do try to keep up.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You can encrypt emails, we’ve been doing it for decades. It’s easier to compromise faxes than encrypted emails

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

The message I was responding to uses fax.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

In principle none of that data should leave the phone line. Dunno whether carriers encrypt VoIP but in any case it shouldn't leak into the internet. Back in the days it was considered secure because in practice it's indeed similarly secure as a letter: In organisational terms, yes, in computer science terms, hell no.