this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
428 points (83.0% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
10 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
428
We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image. (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
401 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Hows it a red herring to point out we are allowed to use copyrighted materials already? Its not the concern here, yet its what they are using as the concern for their arguments against it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Because copyright law is clear in that computers can't own a copyright.

The humans at play are:

  1. The artist who created the original work.

  2. The computer IT team who are copying the data behind the scenes between servers.

  3. You who uses Midjourney to recreate "Joker" movie artwork, likely using the data in #2 which falls under copyright infringement.

It doesn't matter how #2 works. It doesn't matter if its H.265 or MPEG2 or from VHS tapes, or if its a Neural Network using the latest-and-greatest training weights from a GPU-based datasystem. Its just a computer. The ones doing the copyright infringement are the people copying data from place to place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The AI model is not a copy of the set of data used to train it, it's a derivative work. As such copyright as it currently stands does not apply. It's possible, likely even, that copyright will be modified in some way soon to account for this, but the situation today says nope, not copyright infringement.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

They're really trying so hard cuz they absolutely want this to be infringement but it simply isnt on any legal level.