this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
1748 points (97.8% liked)

linuxmemes

20880 readers
8 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 48 points 10 months ago (3 children)

A smart distro allows you to change DEs without changing the distro, though.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Is it just me or is every new distro just a base with a different DE? I started to notice this a few years back but not sure if it was my imagination or something developers starting doing because it was easier to ship the DE as "the OS" than it was to instruct users on how to switch to their DE.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's pretty much it. Distros used to be about experimenting with different packaging systems and system managers, but now seems like the packaging systems are mostly the three: Arch, Debian, Red Hat. And the system manager is almost always systemd.

So the only thing to do (beyond better quality control, which takes a lot of constant work) is to make the DE somehow unique.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Repositories and package versioning are also extremely important in ways newbies don't realize yet. There's a significant variety between using Debian, Ubuntu, Pop!_OS or Kali. They are all Debian based using apt but they are all decidedly entirely different systems with completely different purposes and uses.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

They could be using different package managers or different repos

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I think the default setting matters, if there is any. Looking at Gentoo.

Fun aside, I think Fedora might be a good choice, because Gnome is easy and polished!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Fedora also comes with a dozen different DEs prepackaged and installable with a single, simple command. Each user just can select and change their own desktop with a menu selection on the login screen

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

My problem with Gnome is if it were my desktop, I might as well run Windows, since Gnome shell/mutter is slightly less capable than Windows. Extensions exist, but are very much a second class citizen and get broken by shell versions frequently, and the author of an extension may be gone when it comes time to rework it for a new version.

Plasma/kwin have pretty much everything I want in desktop/window management baked in.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

I love gnome overall and it's my favorite de, but the missing features and extensions being almost mandatory for basic functions definitely are a pain.

Extensions are cool but the basics should be built in.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Fedora has ten other desktops to choose from. I'm currently test driving Budgie

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

I do fedora with KDE/plasma.

Nowadays fedora is a decent "boring" distribution, that finally settled into blatantly prompting to add the non free repositories you will probably want.

Ubuntu was annoying with it's little adventures in "not invented here" with mir, unity, and nowadays snap. So nice to have a modern, boring distribution.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Are there (sizeable) distros that does not allow you to install multiple DE's and change between them?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

That's not usually the problem. Usually you can generally do this on any distro, even ones that have a higher level of integration with their DE.

The problem is more likely to be issues caused by overlapping configurations and base libraries that can cause weird issues if they aren't swapped out or kept default. If they aren't default and are managed by the package manager, usually the package manager will mark it as modified and often won't touch it unless you purge the configurations. Some will ask and some will straight up nuke em.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

To me the problem is actually removing the old one. You can easily uninstall gnome, but it will leave behind config files and various data. It's less clean.

Also, there's an overlap in the libraries required by DEs, so you should use the "replace" option in you package manager (if it has one) to let o t figure out the best way to uninstall one and install the other.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's a problem with the package manager

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Not entirely, for example you don't expect the package manager to remove the gnome folder from the .local of every user

[–] Mikina 3 points 10 months ago

AFAIK Fedora comes with Gnome and KDE, both in Wayland and X11 version, out of the box, and you can just select one when logging in.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I'm sure they all allow it, but some make it awkward enough that a reinstall might be a better option.