this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
264 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
19 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Users of those services will be steered toward the web
  • Searches indicate apps from Meta may also be unavailable

Bypass paywall: https://archive.ph/4kfYI

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You can get that for $500 with the quest 3

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The resolution isn't quite there yet, and I think the headset is too heavy to wear for 8hrs a day, 5 days a week (plus leisure if you're a gamer or hobbyist)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Quest 3 is light. 515 grams. Vision Pro is 600-650 grams.

Yes, pass through resolution isn't there yet. Virtual monitor are fine though, especially large.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No you can't.

The resolution is not close to sufficient for a monitor with any meaningful amount of text on it. Your eyes will be bleeding in about 2 minutes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

For pass-through monitor reading, yeah. 4MP won't compare to the iVision's 12MP. But "Quest generated" monitors are perfectly fine, especially if you blow them up to 8 feet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm not talking about passing monitors through. I'm talking about having multiple virtual monitors in your field of view.

A shitty virtual 1080p screen taking your entire field of view is not even vaguely capable of being used for productivity purposes. It's not remotely close. The whole point of multiple physical displays is to have a meaningful amount of information directly visible at once.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

1080p doesn't exist in a virtual environment.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's the generous best case of what you can tell a computer to display to, and it is still guaranteed to make text look like absolute shit.

It is not possible to use the terrible resolution of any of the quests to replace multiple physical monitors for productivity. The displays are bad for literally everything but entertainment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I've used it. Have you? You won't be editing photos, but reading text is perfectly fine.

BTW, The Quest 3 has the same horizontal resolution as the Vision pro.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes. The exact same reason you admitted that you can't pass through a monitor is the reason it cannot possibly be used for any productivity requiring text. The density real monitors have is the density you have to have for productivity use.

Text is not mediocre. It's absolute, blow your brains out trash. You cannot do meaningful reading on it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Yes, reading passthough text is trash. The upgraded 4MP cameras on the quest 3 are still not good enough. I'm not convinced the apple's 6.5MP will be sufficient either.