this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
55 points (98.2% liked)

Australia

3507 readers
84 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why do you assume a single income household means 1) a heterosexual household and 2) the man is the one that works?

Stop thinking like that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I gave up a job to became a home dad just after the Howard era when single income households were more valued and supported even if it was for dubious cultural reasons. My partner had better job security and income and I could supplement our income with work from home. I understand some of the issues women have traditionally faced staying at home. It is socially isolating, probably more so for a bloke, and returning to the workforce can be challenging. It wasn't a bad option at the time. I would not choose it today as things are a lot harsher now and while I valued my time with the kids for the most part it is a career killer.

It is something I think only people who are very wealthy will be able to do in the future without a UBI or other support. It is hard to view that loss of opportunity as a win for working families. If the primary earner is making more than the median income, a second income should be enhancing wealth for nice things and holidays as it was, not essential to pay the electricity bill and rent as it is now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

yeah the fact that women in the workforce has translated to "Twice as many peasants!" is a fucking bad look for us as a species. dammit capitalism, could you not, just once....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think like that, I'm only talking in a historical context.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But we were discussing a theoretical future change

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You weren't discussing anything.
You came along afterwards, misinterpreted one post out of context and called me out for an imagined slight.