this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
58 points (96.8% liked)

Selfhosted

39435 readers
3 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
58
Anyone using rustic? (github.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hey, you probably know about restic and borg for backups. They are pretty mature and very commonly used.

Rustic is a fully compatible reimplementation of restic in Rust and they do seem to have implemented a few improvements over restic. The developer even used to be a contributor on restic.

Is anyone here using it already? It looks super promising but I'd love to hear your opinion!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What is the advantage of using this over restic?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They have a page in the repo describing some advantages https://github.com/rustic-rs/rustic/blob/main/docs/comparison-restic.md

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It sounds like they have some nice improvements, but I wonder why they didn't contribute them back to the original restic project.

I also wouldn't rely on an immature piece of software to handle backups - you want to avoid as many risk factors as possible with backups, since when you need to restore you really need it to work.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

FYI, you formated your link wrong, it should be [here](https://github.com/rustic-rs/rustic/blob/main/docs/comparison-restic.md)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can never remember the order and I’m using Wefwef which doesn’t offer markdown insert. Thanks :)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The way I remember the order is that the parentheses around the link would make grammatical sense outside of markdown (the goal of markdown is to still be fully readable even when looking at the raw source).

For example if I were posting on a forum that didn't have markdown support which one of these would make more sense:

  1. You can find that on this lemmy instance (https://lemmy.world).
  2. You can find that on (this lemmy instance) https://lemmy.world.

Option 2 makes no sense grammatically. Then you just need to use the square brackets (which rarely show up in non-markdown text) to denote the link range.

Alternatively, if you still have a hard time remembering the order, you can use reference-style links which make it even more readable outside of markdown rendered contexts (note that there are no parentheses in this version, nothing to get confused):

[Here is a link][1] and [here is another link][2].

[1]: http://example.org
[2]: http://example.com