this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
44 points (76.2% liked)

Memes

45651 readers
1555 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I mean... disrupting international trade is just asking for trouble.

That's not even a "capitalism bad" thing; it's just a matter of fact that safe international trade needs to be a thing in order to have a global economy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Yemen has the right to embargo whoever they want from using their waters.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not "their" waters, it's internationally recognized shipping lanes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

“Internationally recognized” not by Yemen. The Yemeni had no saying on that. That is just imperialist appropriating Yemeni’s waters and then using their influence to validate their claim. What you are spreading is gross imperialist propaganda.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You can't restrict access to waterways that other countries further upstream depend on to function. If this were the US cutting off access to the sea for say, the Gaza strip (which they already help Israel do, actually, so I am definitely not saying they are morally right here), then you'd have a much different opinion on it, wouldn't you?

Almost the entire world recognizes this basic courtesy of the sea. It's like damming a river for yourself and starving out others who weren't as fortunate to live closer to the source.

Either we have free access to the oceans and waterways for all, or we just shut down international trade and all become hermit kingdoms.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The US has several active embargos on countries like Cuba via sea, its completely right for other countries to resist America by utilizing the same tactics they do. Its like spies, sure we can all agree unaccounted agents of the state who infilitrate other govs is inherently a bad thing, but if we where to stop it from happening it would require the country with the most power to stop first; otherwise its a prisoners dilenma where you either lower yourself to there level and as such manage to stay ahead, or take the purist route and dont do it at all, and now you're just being dominated.

Comparing a Yemen blockade, a bombed and oppressed country from illegal cluster muntions dropped on them between 2016-now by the West to American blockades, which are repressive tools used by a rich country under no actual threat is disenginous and carries water for the fascist american regime.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I don't agree with the US doing it either. Freedom of travel by sea should be a basic human right.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Yeah well if it slows down the US's and Isreals genocide im all for it, at least someones doing something.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

I disagree. There should not be freedom to transport aid to a genocidal entity to keep genociding people. Advocating for freedom for that in the umbrella of “human rights” is just plain disingenuous and irresponsible if not downright evil.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You can very easily make a correct hypocrisy argument but it's not just the USA going out of its way to bomb brown people. They were warned (threatened really) explicitly by for example the UN that if they kept shit up there'd be consequences and well they kept fucking around. Everybody wants safe maritime trade and they were raiding civilian vessels breaking international law. What's happening is an obvious consequence of their behavior.

But again you can easily make a correct hypocrisy argument for the USAs behavior cause well you know there's kind of a genocide going on we still haven't done jack shit about.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Even outside of the genocide, which is the primary factor and would be enough by itself, the Yemen people have every right to have grievances with the west considering they have been helping drop bombs that violate human rights treaties on them.

https://news.sky.com/story/saudi-arabia-using-uk-made-cluster-bombs-in-yemen-fallon-to-confirm-10702271

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago
  1. This isn't Yemen, it's the Houthis. AFAIK, the internationally recognized State of Yemen isn't involved.

  2. We're talking international shipping routes. What the Houthi movement is engaging in is piracy, plain and simple.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago

Houthi Militia =/= Yemen

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Its just halted right ? the ships will be eventually let go they are not looting or attacking them are they ? If just halted i dont think there is need to respond that extremely correct me though

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

The Houthis also gave fair warning to the ships to go back and they just turned off their radios and continued anyway to provide aid to a genocidal entity. The Houthis are trying to help Palestine not to be genocided. Any response to a genocidal entity is justified.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not halted; The Houthi movement has been firing missiles and sending drones at civilian vessels. They were given fair warning to stop by the coalition members of Operation Prosperity Guardian, and continued to attack anyway.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

The Houthis also gave fair warning to the ships to go back and they just turned off their radios and continued anyway to provide aid to a genocidal entity. The Houthis are trying to help Palestine not to be genocided. Any response to a genocidal entity is justified.