Games

31990 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

Submissions have to be related to games
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
No excessive self-promotion
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

220

Games that force you to make hard choices (lemmy.world)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

198 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hey all!

I'd like to request recommendations (spoiler free!) for games where you need to make choices, take sides, kill or not kill someone, follow or do not follow orders, but where the consequences actually matter - and most importantly, where the choices aren't "obviously good choice vs obviously bad choice".

Give me games where I can choose to side with one kingdom or another, but there's no clear moral high ground, or where I need to decide to save someone dear to me at the cost of innocent lives. I do not want things like "save all the children and get the happy ending and make flowers grow" versus "kill everybody and everything blows up and the world gets all its water replaced by acid".

What games fit this requirement?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fallout New Vegas - You can literally help a gang take over the starting town like 5 minutes into the game.

Souls games - The games constantly autosave in the background and (sometimes out of nowhere) present you with some very unclear choices. In Sekiro you have a choice around two thirds into the game which causes the game to end immediately (with a very bad ending); since the game autosaves all the time, once you make that choice you have to start the entire game over and get to that point again to make a different choice.

Most CRPGs I played had meaningful choices (sometimes having extreme effects on the game world):

Planescape: Torment - Best CRPG ever IMO.

Tyranny, Pillars of Eternity - Modern CRPGs by Obsidian, both amazing. I haven't played Pillars of Eternity 2 yet.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In Sekiro you have a choice around two thirds into the game which causes the game to end immediately (with a very bad ending); since the game autosaves all the time, once you make that choice you have to start the entire game over and get to that point again to make a different choice.

Yeah, that's bad game design IMO unless the game is an hour or two long. The player should be able to roll back when they fuck up that much. In fact, only one save file and no way to roll back if it gets corrupted or you realize how badly you have fucked up is always a bad design.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The fact you can't rollback means every choice really matters.

Edit: Also there are multiple endings and New Game+ so you are encouraged to play the game again anyway.

I beat Sekiro like 5 times at this point

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The random premature endings were already annoying in nier automata, and that did have save files. I almost never replay things, I get extremely bored. Took me forever to get through the second playthrough of nier automata as well, since that is so similar to the first.

If a game pulled that on me I just wouldn't play it ever again and watch a cut scene compilation or something.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Then don't play those games? I don't understand the point of your comment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because I am going to know ahead of time if a game does that? And it's not like I didn't enjoy nier automata.

Also no ones saying games can't have anything like that, just that it's not really what would generally be considered good design.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

In Sekiro, while it is not made clear that the decision will end the game (after a boss fight), it is obviously a very important decision, so I don't think making the stakes actually high is bad design - the stakes being high is one of the reasons I like souls games.

I didn't like Nier Automata and didn't play it much, so I don't know about its abrupt endings, and how they are presented and handled.

Edit: I didn't mean to be rude in my last comment, I was being genuine - souls games are known for this stuff (not specifically abrupt endings, but rather abrupt meaningful choices).

Your reply made me realize however that it might just be Nier's implementation of the idea which you dislike, not the idea in general.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yea, from how you made it sound it seems similar to how it ended up being in nier - make a choice that does seem like it'll end the game, but really it's probably not very serious - credit roll, hope you saved recently. It would've very much benefited from simply autosaving at the correct time.

Imo it kinda depends on what kind of ending it is, if it's still conclusive but maybe a bad end, that seems alright. Just if it clearly leaves me unsatisfied I'd be annoyed. I'd still really prefer just having a reload option, but I'd also rather game devs stick to their vision, just like fromsoft ganes really don't need an explicit easy mode, it makes sense they'd also stick to this if they want to do it. It'll be great for some people, and others will hate it, and that's fine.